ASVBM: Structural variant benchmarking with local joint analysis for multiple callsets

Accurate benchmarking of structural variant (SV) detection is essential for advancing the development and application of human whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A fundamental challenge in benchmarking SV detection results is determining whether two SVs represent the same event. Differences in the variation-awareness and strategic implementation of aligners inherently constrain SV detection algorithms that rely on alignment-based approaches. Traditional benchmarking, which primarily focuses on comparing and matching individual variants, makes it difficult to capture the relationships between multiple adjacent variants. We introduced ASVBM, an improved benchmarking framework that introduces the notion of latent positives and leverages a joint analysis and validation strategy based on local variants. This performance improvement arose from the discovery that multiple smaller variants are nearly equivalent to a larger variant. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of six state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines using real WGS datasets. According to multiple matching criteria, ASVBM employs a joint analysis strategy to uncover potential equivalences between the callset and the benchmark set, thereby reducing false mismatches caused by differences in variant representation. ASVBM is available at https://github.com/zhuxiao/asvbm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.06.045
Primary Topic
Algorithms and Data Compression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASVBM: Structural variant benchmarking with local joint analysis for multiple callsets

Xu Feng, Quan Wei, Jie Huang, Yucui Dong et al.
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Algorithms and Data Compression
article

ASVBM: Structural variant benchmarking with local joint analysis for multiple callsets

Xu Feng, Quan Wei, Jie Huang, Yucui Dong, Chaoqun Zhu, Fei Wang, Li Tong, Yuanjun Ma, Xiao Zhu, Peizheng Mu
article en

Abstract

Accurate benchmarking of structural variant (SV) detection is essential for advancing the development and application of human whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A fundamental challenge in benchmarking SV detection results is determining whether two SVs represent the same event. Differences in the variation-awareness and strategic implementation of aligners inherently constrain SV detection algorithms that rely on alignment-based approaches. Traditional benchmarking, which primarily focuses on comparing and matching individual variants, makes it difficult to capture the relationships between multiple adjacent variants. We introduced ASVBM, an improved benchmarking framework that introduces the notion of latent positives and leverages a joint analysis and validation strategy based on local variants. This performance improvement arose from the discovery that multiple smaller variants are nearly equivalent to a larger variant. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of six state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines using real WGS datasets. According to multiple matching criteria, ASVBM employs a joint analysis strategy to uncover potential equivalences between the callset and the benchmark set, thereby reducing false mismatches caused by differences in variant representation. ASVBM is available at https://github.com/zhuxiao/asvbm.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalVol. 27
South China Agricultural University (CN), Binzhou Medical University (CN), Shandong University of Aeronautics (CN), Yantai University (CN), Yuhuangding Hospital (CN)
Yantai University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Binzhou Medical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Algorithms and Data Compression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.