Adductor Muscle Contraction Under Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During TURBT Under General Anesthesia: Is Obturator Nerve Block Still Necessary?—A Prospective, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Obturator reflex during transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) can cause serious complications, such as bladder perforation, hemorrhage, and incomplete resection. Although obturator nerve block (ONB) is routinely recommended under spinal anesthesia, it is often omitted under general anesthesia (GA) based on the assumption that neuromuscular blockade (NMB) alone prevents adductor muscle contractions. However, clinical observations suggest that the obturator reflex may still occur under deep NMB. This study aimed to determine whether adductor longus muscle (ALM) contraction persists under GA with deep NMB during TURBT. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Thirty patients scheduled for TURBT under GA were prospectively enrolled. A selective ONB was performed under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance. After establishing the baseline current intensity for ALM contraction, neuromuscular monitoring was initiated, and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was administered. Stimulation thresholds required to induce ALM contraction were sequentially assessed at decreasing Train-of-Four ratio (TOFr) stages (90% to 10%) and Train-of-Four count (TOFc) stages (3 to 0). Final measurements were repeated 1 min after achieving TOFc 0. Changes in stimulation intensity were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM). <i>Results</i>: As NMB deepened, the current intensity required to provoke ALM contraction progressively increased: 0.51 ± 0.25 mA at TOFr 90%, 1.66 ± 0.53 mA at TOFr 10%, 2.04 ± 0.66 mA at TOFc 0, and 2.61 ± 0.29 mA at 1 min after TOFc 0. Notably, all patients demonstrated ALM contraction at TOFc 0 and thereafter, confirming the persistence of the obturator reflex despite complete NMB. LMM analysis revealed a significant trend of increasing stimulation thresholds with progressive NMB depth (β = 0.133, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Adductor muscle contractions in response to obturator nerve stimulation persist even under deep NMB. These findings raise concerns that deep NMB alone may be insufficient to prevent obturator reflex and suggest that ONB should be considered as an adjunctive practice during TURBT under GA in patients at risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071207
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adductor Muscle Contraction Under Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During TURBT Under General Anesthesia: Is Obturator Nerve Block Still Necessary?—A Prospective, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study

S. Cho, Ki Tae Jung
1 citations
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Adductor Muscle Contraction Under Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During TURBT Under General Anesthesia: Is Obturator Nerve Block Still Necessary?—A Prospective, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study

S. Cho, Ki Tae Jung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Obturator reflex during transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) can cause serious complications, such as bladder perforation, hemorrhage, and incomplete resection. Although obturator nerve block (ONB) is routinely recommended under spinal anesthesia, it is often omitted under general anesthesia (GA) based on the assumption that neuromuscular blockade (NMB) alone prevents adductor muscle contractions. However, clinical observations suggest that the obturator reflex may still occur under deep NMB. This study aimed to determine whether adductor longus muscle (ALM) contraction persists under GA with deep NMB during TURBT. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Thirty patients scheduled for TURBT under GA were prospectively enrolled. A selective ONB was performed under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance. After establishing the baseline current intensity for ALM contraction, neuromuscular monitoring was initiated, and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was administered. Stimulation thresholds required to induce ALM contraction were sequentially assessed at decreasing Train-of-Four ratio (TOFr) stages (90% to 10%) and Train-of-Four count (TOFc) stages (3 to 0). Final measurements were repeated 1 min after achieving TOFc 0. Changes in stimulation intensity were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM). <i>Results</i>: As NMB deepened, the current intensity required to provoke ALM contraction progressively increased: 0.51 ± 0.25 mA at TOFr 90%, 1.66 ± 0.53 mA at TOFr 10%, 2.04 ± 0.66 mA at TOFc 0, and 2.61 ± 0.29 mA at 1 min after TOFc 0. Notably, all patients demonstrated ALM contraction at TOFc 0 and thereafter, confirming the persistence of the obturator reflex despite complete NMB. LMM analysis revealed a significant trend of increasing stimulation thresholds with progressive NMB depth (β = 0.133, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Adductor muscle contractions in response to obturator nerve stimulation persist even under deep NMB. These findings raise concerns that deep NMB alone may be insufficient to prevent obturator reflex and suggest that ONB should be considered as an adjunctive practice during TURBT under GA in patients at risk.

MedicinaVol. 61(7)
Chosun University (KR), Chosun University Hospital (KR)
Chosun University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.