Advancing the Representation of Human Actions in Large‐Scale Hydrological Models: Challenges and Future Research Directions

Abstract Characterizing the impact of human actions on terrestrial water fluxes and storages at multi‐basin, continental, and global scales has long been on the agenda of scientists engaged in climate science, hydrology, and water resources systems analysis. This need has resulted in a variety of modeling efforts focused on the representation of water infrastructure operations. Yet, the representation of human‐water interactions in large‐scale hydrological models is still relatively crude, fragmented across models, and often achieved at coarse resolutions (10–100 km) that cannot capture local water management decisions. In this commentary, we argue that the concomitance of four drivers and innovations is poised to change the status quo: “hyper‐resolution” hydrological models (0.1–1 km), multi‐sector modeling, satellite missions able to monitor the outcome of human actions, and machine learning are creating a fertile environment for human‐water research to flourish. We then outline four challenges that chart future research in hydrological modeling: (a) creating hyper‐resolution global data sets of water management practices, (b) improving the characterization of anthropogenic interventions on water quantity, stream temperature, and sediment transport, (c) improving model calibration and diagnostic evaluation, and (d) reducing the computational requirements associated with the successful exploration of these challenges. Overcoming them will require addressing modeling, computational, and data development needs that cut across the hydrology community, thereby requiring a major communal effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039486
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the Representation of Human Actions in Large‐Scale Hydrological Models: Challenges and Future Research Directions

Stefano Galelli, Jia Yi Ng, Sean Turner, Francesca Pianosi et al.
10 citations
Water Resources Research
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
11.05
article

Advancing the Representation of Human Actions in Large‐Scale Hydrological Models: Challenges and Future Research Directions

Stefano Galelli, Jia Yi Ng, Sean Turner, Francesca Pianosi, Hester Biemans, Yadu Pokhrel, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Andrea Castelletti
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Characterizing the impact of human actions on terrestrial water fluxes and storages at multi‐basin, continental, and global scales has long been on the agenda of scientists engaged in climate science, hydrology, and water resources systems analysis. This need has resulted in a variety of modeling efforts focused on the representation of water infrastructure operations. Yet, the representation of human‐water interactions in large‐scale hydrological models is still relatively crude, fragmented across models, and often achieved at coarse resolutions (10–100 km) that cannot capture local water management decisions. In this commentary, we argue that the concomitance of four drivers and innovations is poised to change the status quo: “hyper‐resolution” hydrological models (0.1–1 km), multi‐sector modeling, satellite missions able to monitor the outcome of human actions, and machine learning are creating a fertile environment for human‐water research to flourish. We then outline four challenges that chart future research in hydrological modeling: (a) creating hyper‐resolution global data sets of water management practices, (b) improving the characterization of anthropogenic interventions on water quantity, stream temperature, and sediment transport, (c) improving model calibration and diagnostic evaluation, and (d) reducing the computational requirements associated with the successful exploration of these challenges. Overcoming them will require addressing modeling, computational, and data development needs that cut across the hydrology community, thereby requiring a major communal effort.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(7)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Utrecht University (NL), Peking University (CN), Cornell University (US), University of Bristol (GB), RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT), Michigan State University (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
National Science Foundation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
11.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.