Functional Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Type II and Type III

Abstract Background: Surgically repairing radial head fractures through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can pose challenges, making radial head resection a recognized treatment option. Objective: In this research, we examined the outcomes of various methods employed in radial head resection and contrasted them with those of ORIF in individuals experiencing a compressed radial head fracture. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one individuals aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with Mason type II and III radial head fractures, participated in this study. Among them, 14 patients received radial head resection through ORIF employing Herbert screw and K-wire, four underwent L-plate and K-wire fixation, while three underwent mini-T-plate fixation. The evaluation of functional outcomes was conducted using the Broberg and Morrey rating system at 1–3 months postsurgery and again at the 6-month mark. Parameters such as pain level, range of motion, muscle strength, and joint stability were meticulously measured during the assessments. Results: In our study, we found that out of 15 patients, 1 patient had a satisfactory outcome while 4 patients had fair outcomes and 1 patient had a poor outcome. The mean functional index was 81.9 points and the mean range of movement at the elbow was 8°–116° (normal arc is 0°–135°) for flexion. The mean pronation was 58° (normal 60°) and the mean supination was 43° (normal 70°). Arm strength was significantly improved at 3 months in all surgical groups. Pain was moderate in all groups and gradually reduced up to 6 months. Conclusion: ORIF with T-plate, L-plate, or Herbert screw in radial fracture resulted in similar outcomes. Each of these methods leads to adequate joint mobility and offers superior strength and overall functional improvement compared to radial head resection. However, a comparison with conventional methods (such as plaster) is recommended. Level of Evidence: Prospective cohort comparison; surgery outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_110_22
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Type II and Type III

Sushil Mankar, Nilesh Joshi, Sanjay Deshpande, Aashay Kekatpure et al.
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Functional Outcomes After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Type II and Type III

Sushil Mankar, Nilesh Joshi, Sanjay Deshpande, Aashay Kekatpure, Priyanka Gaikwad, Shalva Natu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Surgically repairing radial head fractures through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can pose challenges, making radial head resection a recognized treatment option. Objective: In this research, we examined the outcomes of various methods employed in radial head resection and contrasted them with those of ORIF in individuals experiencing a compressed radial head fracture. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one individuals aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with Mason type II and III radial head fractures, participated in this study. Among them, 14 patients received radial head resection through ORIF employing Herbert screw and K-wire, four underwent L-plate and K-wire fixation, while three underwent mini-T-plate fixation. The evaluation of functional outcomes was conducted using the Broberg and Morrey rating system at 1–3 months postsurgery and again at the 6-month mark. Parameters such as pain level, range of motion, muscle strength, and joint stability were meticulously measured during the assessments. Results: In our study, we found that out of 15 patients, 1 patient had a satisfactory outcome while 4 patients had fair outcomes and 1 patient had a poor outcome. The mean functional index was 81.9 points and the mean range of movement at the elbow was 8°–116° (normal arc is 0°–135°) for flexion. The mean pronation was 58° (normal 60°) and the mean supination was 43° (normal 70°). Arm strength was significantly improved at 3 months in all surgical groups. Pain was moderate in all groups and gradually reduced up to 6 months. Conclusion: ORIF with T-plate, L-plate, or Herbert screw in radial fracture resulted in similar outcomes. Each of these methods leads to adequate joint mobility and offers superior strength and overall functional improvement compared to radial head resection. However, a comparison with conventional methods (such as plaster) is recommended. Level of Evidence: Prospective cohort comparison; surgery outcome.

Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences UniversityVol. 20(2)
NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital (IN), Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.