Breakpoint Withdrawals and Emerging Evidence: Reframing Clinical Decisions for B. cepacia complex and S. maltophilia
CLSI (2025) and EUCAST (2024) have removed breakpoints for most agents against BCC, requiring MIC reporting based on WT/NWT distributions. For S. maltophilia, CLSI no longer supports monotherapy with Co-trimoxazole or levofloxacin; EUCAST retains a breakpoint only for the Co-trimoxazole. Resistance mechanisms, including β-lactamases and RND efflux pumps, limit AST reliability. Diagnostic challenges include species misidentification and distinguishing infection from colonization. Therapeutic options remain limited. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has reduced efficacy; minocycline, fluoroquinolones, and cefiderocol show inconsistent outcomes. Combination therapy offers no clear advantage and should be individualized. These changes necessitate MIC-based, genomics-informed approaches to guide therapy, particularly in low-resource settings.
Authors
- Kamini Walia
- Balaji Veeraraghvan
Institutions
- Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN)
- Indian Council of Medical Research (IN)
- Christian Medical College (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Published
- 2025-07-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2025.100905
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.59