Mastering Geocentric Space: Metaphysics-Technical Consensus

One of the fundamental basic concepts that influenced the formation of modern civilization is the geocentric system of the world. And although the modern idea of the universe differs significantly from the ancient and medieval understanding of the world, nevertheless, the geocentric metrics of space, as the embryonic structures of semantic invariants, leaving the level of the obvious, remain in the foundations of civilization as an obligatory "relict background" of the worldview. The objective of the present study is to identify the structures of geocentric space. In order to achieve this objective, this research will utilize structuralist methodology. This methodological approach will allow for the decomposition of the unified ideological concept of geocentric space into semantic invariants. Despite the intelligible nature of these semantic invariants, they will be dissolved in a variety of material practices. Scientific novelty. The question of distinguishing the structures of geocentric space is new in itself: the invariant layers of meanings that set the navigation grids of the geocentric world as a whole have come into focus. Structural layers define different ways of space exploration while being internally consistent and congruent to each other. Having a qualitative difference between themselves, the structural layers of geocentric space, for various reasons, maintain the integrity of the cosmos and are complementary. The primary structural layer is created by geometric patterns that permeate the cosmos in such a way that the sky is reflected in earthly things; this makes it possible to build unified systems that include stellar and terrestrial objects at the same time. Technological structures manifested in the contradictions of historically growing experience are embedded in the pragmatics of navigation maps and various tools. Technological structures are in permanent transformation and improvement, while geometric structures are initially conditioned by the ideal. Symbolic structures are dissolved in being as such and are the main value and epistemological layer for understanding geocentric space. The symbolic space is double and has a wrong side. The degeneracy of the geocentric structures of space is manifested in the anthropic principle. The world begins to gather around the cognizing consciousness, and the invariants of the universe, represented by the basic constants, do not resist this.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Logos et Praxis
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2025.1.2
Primary Topic
Mathematics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mastering Geocentric Space: Metaphysics-Technical Consensus

Elena Yu. Pogorelskaya
Logos et Praxis
Mathematics and Applications
article

Mastering Geocentric Space: Metaphysics-Technical Consensus

Elena Yu. Pogorelskaya
article en

Abstract

One of the fundamental basic concepts that influenced the formation of modern civilization is the geocentric system of the world. And although the modern idea of the universe differs significantly from the ancient and medieval understanding of the world, nevertheless, the geocentric metrics of space, as the embryonic structures of semantic invariants, leaving the level of the obvious, remain in the foundations of civilization as an obligatory "relict background" of the worldview. The objective of the present study is to identify the structures of geocentric space. In order to achieve this objective, this research will utilize structuralist methodology. This methodological approach will allow for the decomposition of the unified ideological concept of geocentric space into semantic invariants. Despite the intelligible nature of these semantic invariants, they will be dissolved in a variety of material practices. Scientific novelty. The question of distinguishing the structures of geocentric space is new in itself: the invariant layers of meanings that set the navigation grids of the geocentric world as a whole have come into focus. Structural layers define different ways of space exploration while being internally consistent and congruent to each other. Having a qualitative difference between themselves, the structural layers of geocentric space, for various reasons, maintain the integrity of the cosmos and are complementary. The primary structural layer is created by geometric patterns that permeate the cosmos in such a way that the sky is reflected in earthly things; this makes it possible to build unified systems that include stellar and terrestrial objects at the same time. Technological structures manifested in the contradictions of historically growing experience are embedded in the pragmatics of navigation maps and various tools. Technological structures are in permanent transformation and improvement, while geometric structures are initially conditioned by the ideal. Symbolic structures are dissolved in being as such and are the main value and epistemological layer for understanding geocentric space. The symbolic space is double and has a wrong side. The degeneracy of the geocentric structures of space is manifested in the anthropic principle. The world begins to gather around the cognizing consciousness, and the invariants of the universe, represented by the basic constants, do not resist this.

Logos et Praxis(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mathematics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.