Structural behavior of reinforced low-carbon concrete beams adapted for precast

Abstract This study evaluates the structural behavior of two low-carbon self-compacting concretes in comparison to an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete, used as a reference: a binary binder S70 (OPC substituted by 70% of ground granulated blast furnace slag, GGBS,−58% of carbon emission (em-CO 2 ) versus OPC) and a supersulfated cement SSC (− 78% of em-CO 2 versus OPC). For each binder, a mechanical characterization through compressive strength, tensile strength and Young’s modulus tests after 28 days and 90 days, was carried out. Steel–concrete bonding at 28 days was also tested through pull-out tests. Additionally, two beams per binder (3-meter long, section 280 × 150 mm²) were cast, varying the longitudinal reinforcement section: a low steel reinforcement ratio (1.6 cm 2 , Conf1 ) leading to steels rupture, and a high steel reinforcement ratio (7.1 cm 2 , Conf2 ) for higher beam resistance. The design of the beams was made according to Eurocode 2. Beams were tested using 4-point bending test with the recording of strains at different locations of the beam using Digital Image Correlation (DIC). For both configurations, S70 and SSC binders resulted in an equivalent load–deflection behavior compared to OPC beam, despite lower mechanical properties for SSC concrete, while reducing the associated carbon emissions. The DIC system helped to explain the observed fracture modes (reinforcements or “shear force” ruptures) and revealed slight differences in behavior between the beams, such as variations in the position of the neutral axis, as well as number of cracks and opening. These results suggest that structures with low-carbon binders can be dimensioned according to Eurocode 2, similar to OPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials and Structures
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-025-02703-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural behavior of reinforced low-carbon concrete beams adapted for precast

Martin Cyr, Zakaria Ilyes Djamaï, Gabriel Samson, Cédric Patapy et al.
1 citations
Materials and Structures
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
article

Structural behavior of reinforced low-carbon concrete beams adapted for precast

Martin Cyr, Zakaria Ilyes Djamaï, Gabriel Samson, Cédric Patapy, Mathieu Pellerano, Anthony Calviac
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the structural behavior of two low-carbon self-compacting concretes in comparison to an Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) concrete, used as a reference: a binary binder S70 (OPC substituted by 70% of ground granulated blast furnace slag, GGBS,−58% of carbon emission (em-CO 2 ) versus OPC) and a supersulfated cement SSC (− 78% of em-CO 2 versus OPC). For each binder, a mechanical characterization through compressive strength, tensile strength and Young’s modulus tests after 28 days and 90 days, was carried out. Steel–concrete bonding at 28 days was also tested through pull-out tests. Additionally, two beams per binder (3-meter long, section 280 × 150 mm²) were cast, varying the longitudinal reinforcement section: a low steel reinforcement ratio (1.6 cm 2 , Conf1 ) leading to steels rupture, and a high steel reinforcement ratio (7.1 cm 2 , Conf2 ) for higher beam resistance. The design of the beams was made according to Eurocode 2. Beams were tested using 4-point bending test with the recording of strains at different locations of the beam using Digital Image Correlation (DIC). For both configurations, S70 and SSC binders resulted in an equivalent load–deflection behavior compared to OPC beam, despite lower mechanical properties for SSC concrete, while reducing the associated carbon emissions. The DIC system helped to explain the observed fracture modes (reinforcements or “shear force” ruptures) and revealed slight differences in behavior between the beams, such as variations in the position of the neutral axis, as well as number of cracks and opening. These results suggest that structures with low-carbon binders can be dimensioned according to Eurocode 2, similar to OPC.

Materials and StructuresVol. 58(5)
Laboratoire Matériaux et Durabilité des Constructions (FR), Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (FR)
Université de Toulouse
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.