Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Validity of Neuropsychological Memory Tests for Use in Aotearoa New Zealand

Neuropsychological memory testing is vital in the assessment of neurological conditions but evidence suggests that cultural factors can significantly impact upon the validity of the scores obtained. The lack of normative data for different populations may lead to misleading scores/inappropriate diagnoses. The present study aimed to assess clinicians’ perspectives around the validity of memory tests for use in NZ. Clinicians (n = 76) across NZ answered an online survey assessing the perceived validity of memory tests within the domains of working memory, visual learning and retrieval, auditory learning and retrieval, and prospective and autobiographical memory. Several of the most commonly used tests with a large language component were judged as lacking validity amongst clinicians. Current findings provide further evidence that common neuropsychological tests may lack validity and that the development of NZ-normative data and/or NZ specific tests are now long overdue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand journal of psychology
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63146/001c.141653
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Validity of Neuropsychological Memory Tests for Use in Aotearoa New Zealand

Grace Johnstone, Katie M. Douglas, Paul Skirrow, Josh W. Faulkner
New Zealand journal of psychology
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Clinicians’ Perspectives on the Validity of Neuropsychological Memory Tests for Use in Aotearoa New Zealand

Grace Johnstone, Katie M. Douglas, Paul Skirrow, Josh W. Faulkner
article en

Abstract

Neuropsychological memory testing is vital in the assessment of neurological conditions but evidence suggests that cultural factors can significantly impact upon the validity of the scores obtained. The lack of normative data for different populations may lead to misleading scores/inappropriate diagnoses. The present study aimed to assess clinicians’ perspectives around the validity of memory tests for use in NZ. Clinicians (n = 76) across NZ answered an online survey assessing the perceived validity of memory tests within the domains of working memory, visual learning and retrieval, auditory learning and retrieval, and prospective and autobiographical memory. Several of the most commonly used tests with a large language component were judged as lacking validity amongst clinicians. Current findings provide further evidence that common neuropsychological tests may lack validity and that the development of NZ-normative data and/or NZ specific tests are now long overdue.

New Zealand journal of psychologyVol. 54(2)
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.