Heads in the Sand: Assessing the UK Government’s Failure to Foresee the Fall of the Afghan State

Abstract This article explores the UK experience in Afghanistan (2001–2021) to understand why British policymakers did not foresee the rapid collapse of the Afghan state in August 2021. Through interviews with foreign policy practitioners, it highlights the dissonance between the narratives and expectations of UK foreign policy towards Afghanistan and the reality of enacting it within the institutional culture and behaviour prevalent in decision-making circles. It finds that foreign policy formulation was unrealistic, policymakers failed to acknowledge how little agency the UK had in the UK/US relationship, tactical operations provided a false sense of progress towards strategic goals, and Afghan military effectiveness was almost wholly dependent on nato support. Compounding this, the British government’s Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy evacuated those vital to the future success of the Afghan state and created a perfect storm in which policymakers were unable to foresee the imminent crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of International Studies
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-12010003
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heads in the Sand: Assessing the UK Government’s Failure to Foresee the Fall of the Afghan State

Stephen R. Russell
European Review of International Studies
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Heads in the Sand: Assessing the UK Government’s Failure to Foresee the Fall of the Afghan State

Stephen R. Russell
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the UK experience in Afghanistan (2001–2021) to understand why British policymakers did not foresee the rapid collapse of the Afghan state in August 2021. Through interviews with foreign policy practitioners, it highlights the dissonance between the narratives and expectations of UK foreign policy towards Afghanistan and the reality of enacting it within the institutional culture and behaviour prevalent in decision-making circles. It finds that foreign policy formulation was unrealistic, policymakers failed to acknowledge how little agency the UK had in the UK/US relationship, tactical operations provided a false sense of progress towards strategic goals, and Afghan military effectiveness was almost wholly dependent on nato support. Compounding this, the British government’s Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy evacuated those vital to the future success of the Afghan state and created a perfect storm in which policymakers were unable to foresee the imminent crisis.

European Review of International StudiesVol. 12(1)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.