The Nature of Property in Modern Capitalism. Review article of <i>Property in Contemporary Capitalism</i>, (2024) by Paddy Ireland

Abstract In a thought-provoking and important new book, Property in Contemporary Capitalism, Paddy Ireland explores the nature of property in contemporary capitalism. Most analyses of property, he argues, including those offered by property theorists, fail to grasp the empirical realities of modern property, tending instead to offer ideologically loaded accounts which fail, amongst other things, to uncover property’s social relational and class dimensions. Moreover, he suggests, recent developments in property theory—the rejection of so-called ‘bundle-of-rights’ conceptions of property and the emergence of neo-Blackstonian ‘new essentialist’ conceptions that see property in terms of simple person–thing relations (thing-ownership)—are regressive, impeding rather than furthering understanding. Certain forms of property—in particular, property which is used as capital (property-as-capital), much of which is intangible in nature—can only be fully understood when viewed as a social (and class) relation. Although the book is, as the author admits, far from comprehensive in its analysis of property and property theory (there is, for example, only limited engagement with ‘progressive’ property theory), in making these arguments, Ireland outlines an alternative approach to the study and understanding of property that draws on many disciplines, including law, history, anthropology, political economy, and critical finance. In doing this, he reveals important connections between disparate phenomena. Arguing that different sets of property relations and rights structures generate different, historically specific, economic, and social dynamics, he suggests that today’s ‘polycrisis’ is, in significant part, a product of the logic of process generated by our property system and the extension and intensification of that logic brought about by the legal and policy changes to property rights structures over the last half-century—in particular, the financial liberalisation and privatisations associated with neoliberalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contributions to Political Economy
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzaf011
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Nature of Property in Modern Capitalism. Review article of Property in Contemporary Capitalism, (2024) by Paddy Ireland

Gaofeng Meng
Contributions to Political Economy
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

The Nature of Property in Modern Capitalism. Review article of Property in Contemporary Capitalism, (2024) by Paddy Ireland

Gaofeng Meng
article en

Abstract

Abstract In a thought-provoking and important new book, Property in Contemporary Capitalism, Paddy Ireland explores the nature of property in contemporary capitalism. Most analyses of property, he argues, including those offered by property theorists, fail to grasp the empirical realities of modern property, tending instead to offer ideologically loaded accounts which fail, amongst other things, to uncover property’s social relational and class dimensions. Moreover, he suggests, recent developments in property theory—the rejection of so-called ‘bundle-of-rights’ conceptions of property and the emergence of neo-Blackstonian ‘new essentialist’ conceptions that see property in terms of simple person–thing relations (thing-ownership)—are regressive, impeding rather than furthering understanding. Certain forms of property—in particular, property which is used as capital (property-as-capital), much of which is intangible in nature—can only be fully understood when viewed as a social (and class) relation. Although the book is, as the author admits, far from comprehensive in its analysis of property and property theory (there is, for example, only limited engagement with ‘progressive’ property theory), in making these arguments, Ireland outlines an alternative approach to the study and understanding of property that draws on many disciplines, including law, history, anthropology, political economy, and critical finance. In doing this, he reveals important connections between disparate phenomena. Arguing that different sets of property relations and rights structures generate different, historically specific, economic, and social dynamics, he suggests that today’s ‘polycrisis’ is, in significant part, a product of the logic of process generated by our property system and the extension and intensification of that logic brought about by the legal and policy changes to property rights structures over the last half-century—in particular, the financial liberalisation and privatisations associated with neoliberalism.

Contributions to Political EconomyVol. 44(1)
University of London (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), Universidad de Londres (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.