On the Prospects of Theoretical Biology: Life in the Universe as an Anomaly, a Puzzle, and a Counterinstance

Abstract That there are living organisms and life is an empirical fact of the Universe. In the present paper, I discuss three different ways of relating this fact to the fundamentals of natural science. Each may be associated with a respective historical epoch such that, in a nutshell, by the early twentieth century, life had become a well-delineated anomaly apparently conflicting with the fundamentals; in the latter half of the same century and especially due to molecular biology, it came to be viewed as a puzzle which in spite of the anomalous appearance could be “explained”; finally, in the present-century context of system- and organism-level problems, it is, perhaps, in order to consider whether life might be best approached as a counterinstance, whose proper assimilation may require a more profound revision of the fundamentals themselves. This analysis, if valid, suggests to rethink the status for theoretical biology in science. The paper closes by discussing a particular example-proposal that relates the basic problems of theoretical biology on the one hand to the foundations of natural science, and on the other to the current afterthought of mechanistic molecular biology and gene-centric views of evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations of Science
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-025-09995-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Prospects of Theoretical Biology: Life in the Universe as an Anomaly, a Puzzle, and a Counterinstance

Markus Mikael Weckström
1 citations
Foundations of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
article

On the Prospects of Theoretical Biology: Life in the Universe as an Anomaly, a Puzzle, and a Counterinstance

Markus Mikael Weckström
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract That there are living organisms and life is an empirical fact of the Universe. In the present paper, I discuss three different ways of relating this fact to the fundamentals of natural science. Each may be associated with a respective historical epoch such that, in a nutshell, by the early twentieth century, life had become a well-delineated anomaly apparently conflicting with the fundamentals; in the latter half of the same century and especially due to molecular biology, it came to be viewed as a puzzle which in spite of the anomalous appearance could be “explained”; finally, in the present-century context of system- and organism-level problems, it is, perhaps, in order to consider whether life might be best approached as a counterinstance, whose proper assimilation may require a more profound revision of the fundamentals themselves. This analysis, if valid, suggests to rethink the status for theoretical biology in science. The paper closes by discussing a particular example-proposal that relates the basic problems of theoretical biology on the one hand to the foundations of natural science, and on the other to the current afterthought of mechanistic molecular biology and gene-centric views of evolution.

Foundations of Science
University of Helsinki (FI)
Helsingin Yliopisto, Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.