Comparison of two portable metabolic systems for measuring energy expenditure at rest and during exercise in untrained women
K5 and M3B show significant differences in EE measurements during rest and exercise among untrained female individuals, indicating systematic bias in EE measurement between the two systems. Thus, careful consideration is essential when interpreting the results of wearable device studies that use different automated metabolic systems.
Authors
- Shenglong Le (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-9660)
- Junhua Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2731-0749)
- Feng Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-6455)
- Di Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-1416)
- Weiwei Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-2364)
- Zhi Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9416-5927)
- Wenjun Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-5587)
- Yongfu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9502-5897)
- Yujing Chan-Yu
- Fei Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0576-440X)
Institutions
- Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Taihe Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Published
- 2025-07-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1583703
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Physical Activity and Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.33