Assessment of hemodynamic changes in high school students following COVID-19 infection: a crosssectional study

Objective: To assess hemodynamic changes in high school students during the McArdle step test following COVID-19 infection. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved high school students aged 14 to 17 years, divided into two groups: those previously infected with COVID-19 (CV-19) and a control group (CG). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO₂) were monitored. Participants also performed a stair-climbing test, consisting of climbing and descending stairs for 3 minutes. Results: Twenty-four volunteers participated—12 in the CV-19 group (mean age 17.0 ± 0.0 years) and 12 in the CG group (mean age 16.5 ± 0.7 years). Regarding the measured variables, resting HR (CV-19 vs. CG) was 67.5 ± 3.5 vs. 72.5 ± 0.7 bpm (p = 0.548); post-test HR was 93 ± 19.7 vs. 115 ± 16.9 bpm (p = 0.229). Baseline SBP was 102 ± 9.8 vs. 122 ± 16.9 mmHg (p = 0.570); post-test SBP was 123 ± 14.1 vs. 138 ± 21.2 mmHg (p = 0.092). Baseline DBP was 58 ± 0.0 vs. 71 ± 16.5 mmHg (p = 0.417); post-test DBP was 69 ± 2.8 vs. 76 ± 13.8 mmHg (p = 0.429). Baseline SaO₂ was 94.5 ± 3.5% in both groups (p = 0.859); post-test SaO₂ was 96 ± 1.4 vs. 96.5 ± 0.7% (p = 0.889). Conclusion: Although the results of this pilot study suggest that COVID-19 infection did not significantly affect blood pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation responses in high school students, it is important to note that the small sample size (12 participants per group) limits the statistical power of the analysis. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15406/ijcam.2025.18.00734
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of hemodynamic changes in high school students following COVID-19 infection: a crosssectional study

Marcos Antonio do Nascimento, Diandra Carvalho de Sá Nolêto, Amanda Bárbara da Silva Guimarães, Cristiano Teixeira Mostarda et al.
International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Assessment of hemodynamic changes in high school students following COVID-19 infection: a crosssectional study

Marcos Antonio do Nascimento, Diandra Carvalho de Sá Nolêto, Amanda Bárbara da Silva Guimarães, Cristiano Teixeira Mostarda, Leonardo Pereira da Silva, Marcos Alexandre Carvalho Torres, Gustavo de Sá Oliveira Lima, Jayane Santana Santos, Dângela Bezerra de Sena Borges, Joselia Santos Almeira
article en

Abstract

Objective: To assess hemodynamic changes in high school students during the McArdle step test following COVID-19 infection. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved high school students aged 14 to 17 years, divided into two groups: those previously infected with COVID-19 (CV-19) and a control group (CG). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SaO₂) were monitored. Participants also performed a stair-climbing test, consisting of climbing and descending stairs for 3 minutes. Results: Twenty-four volunteers participated—12 in the CV-19 group (mean age 17.0 ± 0.0 years) and 12 in the CG group (mean age 16.5 ± 0.7 years). Regarding the measured variables, resting HR (CV-19 vs. CG) was 67.5 ± 3.5 vs. 72.5 ± 0.7 bpm (p = 0.548); post-test HR was 93 ± 19.7 vs. 115 ± 16.9 bpm (p = 0.229). Baseline SBP was 102 ± 9.8 vs. 122 ± 16.9 mmHg (p = 0.570); post-test SBP was 123 ± 14.1 vs. 138 ± 21.2 mmHg (p = 0.092). Baseline DBP was 58 ± 0.0 vs. 71 ± 16.5 mmHg (p = 0.417); post-test DBP was 69 ± 2.8 vs. 76 ± 13.8 mmHg (p = 0.429). Baseline SaO₂ was 94.5 ± 3.5% in both groups (p = 0.859); post-test SaO₂ was 96 ± 1.4 vs. 96.5 ± 0.7% (p = 0.889). Conclusion: Although the results of this pilot study suggest that COVID-19 infection did not significantly affect blood pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation responses in high school students, it is important to note that the small sample size (12 participants per group) limits the statistical power of the analysis. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

International Journal of Complementary & Alternative MedicineVol. 18(3)
Universidade Estadual do Maranhão
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.