Branch-and-Bound versus Lift-and-Project Relaxations in Combinatorial Optimization
Abstract In this note, we consider a theoretical framework for comparing branch-and-bound with classical lift-and-project hierarchies. We simplify our analysis by streamlining the definition of branch-and-bound. We introduce “skewed k -trees” which give a hierarchy of relaxations that is incomparable to that of Sherali-Adams, and we show that it is much better for some instances. We also give an example where lift-and-project does very well and branch-and-bound does not. Finally, we study the set of branch-and-bound trees of height at most k and “squeeze” their effectiveness between two well-known lift-and-project procedures.
Authors
- Yatharth Dubey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-1102)
- Gérard Cornuéjols (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-1021)
Institutions
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Mathematical Programming
- Published
- 2025-07-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-025-02248-7
- Primary Topic
- Optimization and Packing Problems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Office of Naval Research
- Office of Naval Research Global