On the limitations of closed-loop geothermal systems for electricity generation outside high-geothermal gradient fields

Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems (CLGS) involve connecting the injection and production wells through several borehole-sized parallel laterals instead of circulating a working fluid through a fracture network. Companies have garnered millions of dollars in investments on the claim that CLGS is truly scalable for both heating and electricity generation purposes. We show that high flow rates in the laterals lead to a steep drop in production temperatures because of a rapid cooling of the rock matrix surrounding the wells. Overcoming this physical limitation of CLGS demands an expensive task of drilling several multilaterals to reduce the lateral flow rate. Yet, simulation results indicate that, for a reservoir temperature of 180 °C, the total revenue of these systems fail to recover the lifetime costs incurred, even with 30 multilaterals and a production rate of 75 kg/s, which clearly indicates that CLGS are not scalable for solely electricity generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Engineering
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-025-00458-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the limitations of closed-loop geothermal systems for electricity generation outside high-geothermal gradient fields

Víctor Vilarrasa, Sri Kalyan Tangirala
3 citations
Communications Engineering
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
1.09
article

On the limitations of closed-loop geothermal systems for electricity generation outside high-geothermal gradient fields

Víctor Vilarrasa, Sri Kalyan Tangirala
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems (CLGS) involve connecting the injection and production wells through several borehole-sized parallel laterals instead of circulating a working fluid through a fracture network. Companies have garnered millions of dollars in investments on the claim that CLGS is truly scalable for both heating and electricity generation purposes. We show that high flow rates in the laterals lead to a steep drop in production temperatures because of a rapid cooling of the rock matrix surrounding the wells. Overcoming this physical limitation of CLGS demands an expensive task of drilling several multilaterals to reduce the lateral flow rate. Yet, simulation results indicate that, for a reservoir temperature of 180 °C, the total revenue of these systems fail to recover the lifetime costs incurred, even with 30 multilaterals and a production rate of 75 kg/s, which clearly indicates that CLGS are not scalable for solely electricity generation.

Communications EngineeringVol. 4(1)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the limitations of closed-loop geothermal systems for electricity generation outside high-geothermal gradient fields — Víctor Vilarrasa, Sri Kalyan Tangirala · Communications Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS