Combining the Shapley value and the equal division solution: an overview

Abstract We give an overview of several results on the axiomatization and strategic implementation of cooperative game solutions that combine marginalism and egalitarianism. The best-known marginalist solution for cooperative transferable utility games is the Shapley value, while the equal division solution is the most direct egalitarian solution. Both solutions have been axiomatized in various ways, starting with Shapley (1953)’s original axiomatization of his value. His axiomatization heavily relies on a basis for the game space, specifically the unanimity (game) basis. We review several contributions from the literature where using a different basis, and using similar axioms as for the Shapley value, gives the equal division solution or other solutions that combine features of the Shapley value and the equal division solution. We specifically focus on the classes of egalitarian Shapley values and discounted Shapley values. Besides axiomatizations, we discuss strategic implementation of these solutions, where the difference between the mechanisms implementing the different solutions is with respect to the possibility of the negotiations to break down.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Decision
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-025-10050-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining the Shapley value and the equal division solution: an overview

Yukihiko Funaki, René van den Brink
1 citations
Theory and Decision
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
article

Combining the Shapley value and the equal division solution: an overview

Yukihiko Funaki, René van den Brink
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We give an overview of several results on the axiomatization and strategic implementation of cooperative game solutions that combine marginalism and egalitarianism. The best-known marginalist solution for cooperative transferable utility games is the Shapley value, while the equal division solution is the most direct egalitarian solution. Both solutions have been axiomatized in various ways, starting with Shapley (1953)’s original axiomatization of his value. His axiomatization heavily relies on a basis for the game space, specifically the unanimity (game) basis. We review several contributions from the literature where using a different basis, and using similar axioms as for the Shapley value, gives the equal division solution or other solutions that combine features of the Shapley value and the equal division solution. We specifically focus on the classes of egalitarian Shapley values and discounted Shapley values. Besides axiomatizations, we discuss strategic implementation of these solutions, where the difference between the mechanisms implementing the different solutions is with respect to the possibility of the negotiations to break down.

Theory and DecisionVol. 99(1-2)
Waseda University (JP), Tinbergen Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.