<b>Addressing </b><b>t</b><b>he Negative Impact </b><b>o</b><b>f Social Disputes </b><b>o</b><b>n Women'S Lives </b><b>i</b><b>n </b><b>

This study critically investigates the disproportionate impact of social disputes on women within the Pak-Afghan Pashtun society by employing a dual analytical lens rooted in Islamic legal principles and Pashtunwali, the tribal customary law. It reveals how conflicts—frequently stemming from honor codes, land disputes, and deeply embedded patriarchal structures—systematically harm women through coercive practices such as forced marriage settlements (e.g., swara), economic marginalization, and persistent psychological trauma. Despite the robust framework offered by Islamic jurisprudence emphasizing justice (ʿadl), reconciliation (ṣulḥ), and gender equity, these principles are often eclipsed by traditional conflict resolution mechanisms like jirgas, which rarely align with Qur’anic imperatives for women's rights and dignity. Empirical evidence indicates that 45% of women endure psychological distress due to prolonged exposure to tribal conflicts, 60% face chronic poverty from widowhood or displacement, and 25% are subjected to customs such as swara that contravene Qur’anic injunctions on consent (Qurʾān 4:19). In response, the study advocates for a multi-dimensional reform strategy that intertwines legal, cultural, and economic interventions. It proposes the integration of jirga decisions within a Sharīʿah-compliant adjudicative framework to protect women's marital and inheritance rights, alongside cultural reorientation efforts that mobilize religious scholars and media to reinterpret Pashtunwali in light of Islamic ethical ideals such as dignity (karāmah) and justice. Furthermore, the research underscores the necessity of expanding microfinance and vocational training programs for conflict-affected women, ensuring their socio-economic reintegration. Ultimately, it concludes that achieving sustainable peace and gender justice in tribal contexts requires decolonizing traditional dispute resolution practices and re-centering them around the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah—notably the protection of life (nafs), lineage (nasl), and honor (ʿird). Institutionalizing women's voices in peacebuilding processes emerges as a critical step toward transformative and inclusive societal change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.034
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Negative Impact of Social Disputes on Women'S Lives in

Dr Zainab Amin, Dr Samina Begum, Dr Nazia Irfan, Muhammad Aqeel Khan
Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Addressing the Negative Impact of Social Disputes on Women'S Lives in

Dr Zainab Amin, Dr Samina Begum, Dr Nazia Irfan, Muhammad Aqeel Khan
article en

Abstract

This study critically investigates the disproportionate impact of social disputes on women within the Pak-Afghan Pashtun society by employing a dual analytical lens rooted in Islamic legal principles and Pashtunwali, the tribal customary law. It reveals how conflicts—frequently stemming from honor codes, land disputes, and deeply embedded patriarchal structures—systematically harm women through coercive practices such as forced marriage settlements (e.g., swara), economic marginalization, and persistent psychological trauma. Despite the robust framework offered by Islamic jurisprudence emphasizing justice (ʿadl), reconciliation (ṣulḥ), and gender equity, these principles are often eclipsed by traditional conflict resolution mechanisms like jirgas, which rarely align with Qur’anic imperatives for women's rights and dignity. Empirical evidence indicates that 45% of women endure psychological distress due to prolonged exposure to tribal conflicts, 60% face chronic poverty from widowhood or displacement, and 25% are subjected to customs such as swara that contravene Qur’anic injunctions on consent (Qurʾān 4:19). In response, the study advocates for a multi-dimensional reform strategy that intertwines legal, cultural, and economic interventions. It proposes the integration of jirga decisions within a Sharīʿah-compliant adjudicative framework to protect women's marital and inheritance rights, alongside cultural reorientation efforts that mobilize religious scholars and media to reinterpret Pashtunwali in light of Islamic ethical ideals such as dignity (karāmah) and justice. Furthermore, the research underscores the necessity of expanding microfinance and vocational training programs for conflict-affected women, ensuring their socio-economic reintegration. Ultimately, it concludes that achieving sustainable peace and gender justice in tribal contexts requires decolonizing traditional dispute resolution practices and re-centering them around the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah—notably the protection of life (nafs), lineage (nasl), and honor (ʿird). Institutionalizing women's voices in peacebuilding processes emerges as a critical step toward transformative and inclusive societal change.

Social Sciences & Humanity Research ReviewVol. 2(4)
Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar (PK), Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.