Charity Without Choice: The Impact of Receiving Prosocial Gifts on Subsequent Donations

ABSTRACT This study examines how receiving a prosocial gift, defined as a charitable donation made on behalf of another person, affects gift‐recipients' willingness to donate to the associated charity in the future. Four studies reveal that receiving a prosocial gift that is not explicitly requested decreases subsequent donations compared to when there is no gift exchange. This effect arises because an unrequested prosocial gift can threaten gift‐recipients' sense of freedom, eliciting a reactance response that lowers future donation intentions. Consistent with this explanation, we demonstrate that an intervention that restores gift‐recipients' threatened autonomy, by providing them with an opportunity to decide how the initial donation will be used, attenuates the impact of receiving an unrequested prosocial gift on future donations. Our work contributes to the emerging literature on prosocial gift‐giving and highlights the important role of individual freedom in motivating charitable giving. It also provides charity organizations with insights that can help increase repeat donations from prosocial gift‐recipients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charity Without Choice: The Impact of Receiving Prosocial Gifts on Subsequent Donations

Rishad Habib, Ekin Ok, Karl Aquino
1 citations
Psychology and Marketing
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

Charity Without Choice: The Impact of Receiving Prosocial Gifts on Subsequent Donations

Rishad Habib, Ekin Ok, Karl Aquino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how receiving a prosocial gift, defined as a charitable donation made on behalf of another person, affects gift‐recipients' willingness to donate to the associated charity in the future. Four studies reveal that receiving a prosocial gift that is not explicitly requested decreases subsequent donations compared to when there is no gift exchange. This effect arises because an unrequested prosocial gift can threaten gift‐recipients' sense of freedom, eliciting a reactance response that lowers future donation intentions. Consistent with this explanation, we demonstrate that an intervention that restores gift‐recipients' threatened autonomy, by providing them with an opportunity to decide how the initial donation will be used, attenuates the impact of receiving an unrequested prosocial gift on future donations. Our work contributes to the emerging literature on prosocial gift‐giving and highlights the important role of individual freedom in motivating charitable giving. It also provides charity organizations with insights that can help increase repeat donations from prosocial gift‐recipients.

Psychology and MarketingVol. 42(10)
University of British Columbia (CA), Queen's University (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.