Misclassification Matters: A Case for Utilization of Histologic Coding in UK Biobank Analyses

Misclassification and measurement error is a significant issue in epidemiologic research. When utilizing large datasets like the UK Biobank in particular, we found that pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are often erroneously included in studies focused on exocrine pancreatic cancer. This happens when studies use only International Classification of Diseases codes to define their cases. The use of International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition histologic coding can prevent this problem. This commentary examines the prevalence of this issue in published literature and highlights its potential impact on existing studies. Implementing rigorous coding practices and promoting their consistent use among researchers are crucial for ensuring valid and reliable findings in future pancreatic cancer studies using the UK Biobank.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-25-0286
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misclassification Matters: A Case for Utilization of Histologic Coding in UK Biobank Analyses

Bradley D. McDowell, I. Werner, Michael O’Rorke, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Misclassification Matters: A Case for Utilization of Histologic Coding in UK Biobank Analyses

Bradley D. McDowell, I. Werner, Michael O’Rorke, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles
article en

Abstract

Misclassification and measurement error is a significant issue in epidemiologic research. When utilizing large datasets like the UK Biobank in particular, we found that pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are often erroneously included in studies focused on exocrine pancreatic cancer. This happens when studies use only International Classification of Diseases codes to define their cases. The use of International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition histologic coding can prevent this problem. This commentary examines the prevalence of this issue in published literature and highlights its potential impact on existing studies. Implementing rigorous coding practices and promoting their consistent use among researchers are crucial for ensuring valid and reliable findings in future pancreatic cancer studies using the UK Biobank.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 34(7)
University of Iowa (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misclassification Matters: A Case for Utilization of Histologic Coding in UK Biobank Analyses — Bradley D. McDowell, I. Werner, et al. · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS