Burn them all? Use and efficacy of fire as a tool for grassland restoration

Grassland ecosystems have suffered significant degradation and restoring them is fundamental to fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Fire is an important component in the evolution and management of grasslands worldwide and can potentially be used to restore grasslands. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review to know how fire has been used as a tool in grassland ecological restoration and its efficacy. To do that, we collected the results (positive, negative, or null) of fire treatments considering five restoration objectives: (1) increase biotic diversity, (2) remove woody biomass, (3) control exotic species, (4) promote abiotic changes, and (5) improve ecosystem services, and considering different major grassland types and how fire was employed. We discuss our results by summarizing the data, if fire was applied alone or combined with another technique, and considering major grassland types. Our review shows that fire has been used mainly to restore temperate grasslands in North America. Fire tends to yield more positive results than negative; however, the majority of results are null. Fire is highly effective at removing woody biomass, mainly in temperate and Mediterranean grasslands. Fire is also effective controlling exotic species, mainly when combined with other techniques, but it has low efficacy for exotic species control in tropical and subtropical grasslands. The efficacy in xeric grassland along different objectives is low. We conclude that the successful use of fire as a tool in grassland restoration is highly context‐dependent, varying according to grassland ecosystem type, restoration objectives, and techniques employed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Burn them all? Use and efficacy of fire as a tool for grassland restoration

Sandra Cristina Müller, Élise Buisson, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck, Ana Boeira Porto et al.
2 citations
Restoration Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
article

Burn them all? Use and efficacy of fire as a tool for grassland restoration

Sandra Cristina Müller, Élise Buisson, Gerhard Ernst Overbeck, Ana Boeira Porto, Pedro Augusto Thomas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Grassland ecosystems have suffered significant degradation and restoring them is fundamental to fight against climate change and biodiversity loss. Fire is an important component in the evolution and management of grasslands worldwide and can potentially be used to restore grasslands. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review to know how fire has been used as a tool in grassland ecological restoration and its efficacy. To do that, we collected the results (positive, negative, or null) of fire treatments considering five restoration objectives: (1) increase biotic diversity, (2) remove woody biomass, (3) control exotic species, (4) promote abiotic changes, and (5) improve ecosystem services, and considering different major grassland types and how fire was employed. We discuss our results by summarizing the data, if fire was applied alone or combined with another technique, and considering major grassland types. Our review shows that fire has been used mainly to restore temperate grasslands in North America. Fire tends to yield more positive results than negative; however, the majority of results are null. Fire is highly effective at removing woody biomass, mainly in temperate and Mediterranean grasslands. Fire is also effective controlling exotic species, mainly when combined with other techniques, but it has low efficacy for exotic species control in tropical and subtropical grasslands. The efficacy in xeric grassland along different objectives is low. We conclude that the successful use of fire as a tool in grassland restoration is highly context‐dependent, varying according to grassland ecosystem type, restoration objectives, and techniques employed.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(7)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Institut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie Marine et Continentale (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina, Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.