A morphosyntactic analysis of the Turkish inflectional system

This paper explores the cross-linguistically long-attested dichotomy between 1st and 2nd person on the one hand, and 3rd on the other, in the case of Turkish verbal inflection. Motivated by both syntactic and morphological data, I decompose pronouns and verbal inflectional morphology and claim that 3rd person in Turkish does not have person features the way that 1st and 2nd person do. I propose a syntactic analysis for person verbal inflection: a clitic-doubling account in the case of 1st and 2nd person, and in the case of third person, that what looks like person/number agreement is really zero-number agreement coupled with cliticization. Along with this, I discuss the morphological decomposition of four different person inflection categories, giving the vocabulary items and insertion rules underlying the syncretisms across the two nominal and two verbal categories within the framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993; Embick 2015).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.18721
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A morphosyntactic analysis of the Turkish inflectional system

Glossa a journal of general linguistics
Intellectual Property Law
article

A morphosyntactic analysis of the Turkish inflectional system

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the cross-linguistically long-attested dichotomy between 1st and 2nd person on the one hand, and 3rd on the other, in the case of Turkish verbal inflection. Motivated by both syntactic and morphological data, I decompose pronouns and verbal inflectional morphology and claim that 3rd person in Turkish does not have person features the way that 1st and 2nd person do. I propose a syntactic analysis for person verbal inflection: a clitic-doubling account in the case of 1st and 2nd person, and in the case of third person, that what looks like person/number agreement is really zero-number agreement coupled with cliticization. Along with this, I discuss the morphological decomposition of four different person inflection categories, giving the vocabulary items and insertion rules underlying the syncretisms across the two nominal and two verbal categories within the framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993; Embick 2015).

Glossa a journal of general linguisticsVol. 10(1)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A morphosyntactic analysis of the Turkish inflectional system · Glossa a journal of general linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS