Recognizing Trees From Incomplete Decks

ABSTRACT Given a graph , the unlabeled subgraphs are called the cards of . The deck of is the multiset . Wendy Myrvold showed that a disconnected graph and a connected graph both on vertices have at most cards in common and found (infinite) families of trees and disconnected forests for which this upper bound is tight. Bowler, Brown, and Fenner conjectured that this bound is tight for . In this article, we prove this conjecture for sufficiently large . The main result is that a tree and a unicyclic graph on vertices have at most common cards. Combined with Myrvold's work, this shows that it can be determined whether a graph on vertices is a tree from any of its cards. On the basis of this theorem, it follows that any forest and nonforest also have at most common cards. Furthermore, the main ideas of the proof for trees are used to show that the girth of a graph on vertices can be determined based on any of its cards. Lastly, we show that any cards determine whether a graph is bipartite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Graph Theory
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.23274
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Theory Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognizing Trees From Incomplete Decks

Gabriëlle Zwaneveld
Journal of Graph Theory
Advanced Graph Theory Research
article

Recognizing Trees From Incomplete Decks

Gabriëlle Zwaneveld
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Given a graph , the unlabeled subgraphs are called the cards of . The deck of is the multiset . Wendy Myrvold showed that a disconnected graph and a connected graph both on vertices have at most cards in common and found (infinite) families of trees and disconnected forests for which this upper bound is tight. Bowler, Brown, and Fenner conjectured that this bound is tight for . In this article, we prove this conjecture for sufficiently large . The main result is that a tree and a unicyclic graph on vertices have at most common cards. Combined with Myrvold's work, this shows that it can be determined whether a graph on vertices is a tree from any of its cards. On the basis of this theorem, it follows that any forest and nonforest also have at most common cards. Furthermore, the main ideas of the proof for trees are used to show that the girth of a graph on vertices can be determined based on any of its cards. Lastly, we show that any cards determine whether a graph is bipartite.

Journal of Graph TheoryVol. 110(3)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced Graph Theory Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.