What Values are We Teaching? Reassessing the Affective Domain in Ugandan Primary Science Classrooms

There is a growing global concern about the deliberate teaching of values in schools, rather than relying solely on learners implicitly “catching” these values. Likewise, policy frameworks in Uganda emphasise fostering values in learners. However, recent reports indicate numerous challenges related to morality among learners in primary schools, suggesting that fostering values is minimal or absent in these schools. This study explored the values that primary science teachers in Uganda deliberately foster in learners, focusing on their planning and classroom practices. Grounded in an interpretivist paradigm, the research employed a qualitative case study involving two government-aided primary schools purposively selected for their strong academic performance and consistent instructional planning. Data were collected through lesson observations, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews with five Primary Five and Six science teachers. Findings revealed that while teachers fostered a range of values, most commonly respect, responsibility, and care, these were often not deliberately planned but emerged incidentally during classroom interactions. Although participants demonstrated a clear conceptual understanding of values and articulated their importance, their lesson plans and schemes of work frequently lacked systematic integration of the values they deemed essential. Inconsistencies between planned and enacted values were also observed, with many values listed in official documents failing to appear in practice. Teachers reported relying primarily on the national science syllabus when selecting values for instruction, yet these were not always implemented during lessons. The study concludes that despite their awareness of values, teachers did not deliberately integrate them during science lessons. Consequently, there was a misalignment between instructional planning and pedagogical practice. The study recommends that policy frameworks, teacher education programmes, and school-level support systems be strengthened to promote systematic, intentional fostering of values in science classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East African Journal of Education Studies
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.2.3234
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Values are We Teaching? Reassessing the Affective Domain in Ugandan Primary Science Classrooms

Peter Ssenkusu, John Sentongo, George William Kiyingi
East African Journal of Education Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

What Values are We Teaching? Reassessing the Affective Domain in Ugandan Primary Science Classrooms

Peter Ssenkusu, John Sentongo, George William Kiyingi
article en

Abstract

There is a growing global concern about the deliberate teaching of values in schools, rather than relying solely on learners implicitly “catching” these values. Likewise, policy frameworks in Uganda emphasise fostering values in learners. However, recent reports indicate numerous challenges related to morality among learners in primary schools, suggesting that fostering values is minimal or absent in these schools. This study explored the values that primary science teachers in Uganda deliberately foster in learners, focusing on their planning and classroom practices. Grounded in an interpretivist paradigm, the research employed a qualitative case study involving two government-aided primary schools purposively selected for their strong academic performance and consistent instructional planning. Data were collected through lesson observations, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews with five Primary Five and Six science teachers. Findings revealed that while teachers fostered a range of values, most commonly respect, responsibility, and care, these were often not deliberately planned but emerged incidentally during classroom interactions. Although participants demonstrated a clear conceptual understanding of values and articulated their importance, their lesson plans and schemes of work frequently lacked systematic integration of the values they deemed essential. Inconsistencies between planned and enacted values were also observed, with many values listed in official documents failing to appear in practice. Teachers reported relying primarily on the national science syllabus when selecting values for instruction, yet these were not always implemented during lessons. The study concludes that despite their awareness of values, teachers did not deliberately integrate them during science lessons. Consequently, there was a misalignment between instructional planning and pedagogical practice. The study recommends that policy frameworks, teacher education programmes, and school-level support systems be strengthened to promote systematic, intentional fostering of values in science classrooms.

East African Journal of Education StudiesVol. 8(2)
Uganda Martyrs University (UG), Makerere University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.