The impact of a patient decision aid for patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma – a multicenter study

Patients with advanced larynx cancer face challenging treatment decisions. To address this, we developed and tested a patient decision aid (PDA), aiming to reduce decisional conflict (DC), and enhance knowledge and perceived shared decision-making (SDM). In this multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03292341, 2016–2023), a pre/post study design was used. Participants, meeting the inclusion criteria of advanced larynx cancer without distant metastasis, completed questionnaires on knowledge, DC and SDM immediately after counseling (T1) and 6 months post-treatment (T2). The intervention arm utilized the PDA (see https://beslissamen.nl/pda_launch.html?pda=tools/pda_larynx_en/story.html ) before completing T1 questionnaires, while the usual care arm followed standard procedures. Between-group differences in outcomes were estimated using regression models with correction for case mix differences. Total DC score was significantly lower in the intervention arm (n = 46) compared to the usual care arm (n = 45) (adjusted mean difference − 32, 95% CI: -37.4; -26.1, p < 0.001). The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher overall knowledge (mean 69% correct) than the control group (mean 47% correct)(adjusted mean difference 24, 95% CI 15.3; 33.1, p < 0.001). Almost all patients in usual care (44/45, 98%) experienced clinically significant DC (CSDC, DCS > 25), compared to 89% (41/46) in the intervention arm (adjusted OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.01; 1.9) p = 0.238). Perceived SDM was significant higher in the intervention arm (mean 78.16) compared to the usual care arm (mean 70.32); however, both groups exhibited high levels. The PDA for advanced laryngeal cancer effectively reduced decisional conflict, enhanced patients’ knowledge and improved perceived SDM. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03292341, 20,151,231. 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03080-x
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of a patient decision aid for patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma – a multicenter study

Anne N. Heirman, György B. Halmos, Frank Hoebers, Michiel W. M. van den Brekel et al.
4 links
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

The impact of a patient decision aid for patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma – a multicenter study

Anne N. Heirman, György B. Halmos, Frank Hoebers, Michiel W. M. van den Brekel, Martijn M. Stuiver, Simone E. J. Eerenstein, Japke F. Petersen, Lisette van der Molen, Bertram J. de Kleijn, Bernard M. Tijink, Abrahim Al‐Mamgani, Richard Dirven
article en

Abstract

Patients with advanced larynx cancer face challenging treatment decisions. To address this, we developed and tested a patient decision aid (PDA), aiming to reduce decisional conflict (DC), and enhance knowledge and perceived shared decision-making (SDM). In this multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03292341, 2016–2023), a pre/post study design was used. Participants, meeting the inclusion criteria of advanced larynx cancer without distant metastasis, completed questionnaires on knowledge, DC and SDM immediately after counseling (T1) and 6 months post-treatment (T2). The intervention arm utilized the PDA (see https://beslissamen.nl/pda_launch.html?pda=tools/pda_larynx_en/story.html ) before completing T1 questionnaires, while the usual care arm followed standard procedures. Between-group differences in outcomes were estimated using regression models with correction for case mix differences. Total DC score was significantly lower in the intervention arm (n = 46) compared to the usual care arm (n = 45) (adjusted mean difference − 32, 95% CI: -37.4; -26.1, p < 0.001). The intervention group demonstrated significantly higher overall knowledge (mean 69% correct) than the control group (mean 47% correct)(adjusted mean difference 24, 95% CI 15.3; 33.1, p < 0.001). Almost all patients in usual care (44/45, 98%) experienced clinically significant DC (CSDC, DCS > 25), compared to 89% (41/46) in the intervention arm (adjusted OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.01; 1.9) p = 0.238). Perceived SDM was significant higher in the intervention arm (mean 78.16) compared to the usual care arm (mean 70.32); however, both groups exhibited high levels. The PDA for advanced laryngeal cancer effectively reduced decisional conflict, enhanced patients’ knowledge and improved perceived SDM. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03292341, 20,151,231. 3.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 25(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Quality of Life Research Center (DK), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Maastro Clinic (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.