A prospective diagnostic study investigating urinary biomarkers of AKI in major abdominal surgery (the AKI-biomas study)

In this large prospective study of a clinical cohort of 488 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery AKI rates are dependent on the criteria used with 49.5% of patients developed AKI by urine output criteria, compared to only 8.8% by serum creatinine. NGAL and IGFBP-7*TIMP-2 showed reasonable diagnostic performance when diagnosing AKI by serum creatinine criteria, with NGAL returning the highest AUC values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05510-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective diagnostic study investigating urinary biomarkers of AKI in major abdominal surgery (the AKI-biomas study)

Rishabh Singh, Lui G. Forni, Timothy Rockall, T. N. Singh et al.
3 citations
Critical Care
Acute Kidney Injury Research
4.29
article

A prospective diagnostic study investigating urinary biomarkers of AKI in major abdominal surgery (the AKI-biomas study)

Rishabh Singh, Lui G. Forni, Timothy Rockall, T. N. Singh, William C. MacLean, Paul Mackenzie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this large prospective study of a clinical cohort of 488 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery AKI rates are dependent on the criteria used with 49.5% of patients developed AKI by urine output criteria, compared to only 8.8% by serum creatinine. NGAL and IGFBP-7*TIMP-2 showed reasonable diagnostic performance when diagnosing AKI by serum creatinine criteria, with NGAL returning the highest AUC values.

Critical CareVol. 29(1)
Royal Surrey County Hospital (GB), Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Royal College of Surgeons of England, University of Surrey
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.