Evaluating the Dentin‐Adhesive Interface of a Nanoparticle‐Enhanced Universal Adhesive Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Its Impact on <scp>μTBS</scp> and Degree of Conversion

Evaluation of the effects of various nanoparticles (NPs), titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>), cerium dioxide (CeO<sub>2</sub>), and copper oxide (CuO), when incorporated into universal adhesive (UA), on the micro tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), adhesive interface, and resin tag assessment. Before incorporating nanoparticles (NPs) into UA, elemental analysis was conducted on all NP types using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The study involved 48 intact human molars, divided into four groups based on UA modification with different NPs: Group 1 (Control), Group 2 (TiO<sub>2</sub>NPs), Group 3 (CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs), and Group 4 (CuONPs). Samples were restored with composite and light cured. All specimens underwent 10,000 cycles of thermocycling for aging, followed by μTBS testing and failure mode evaluation using a universal testing machine and stereomicroscope. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was employed to assess the DC. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to evaluate resin tag length and examine the adhesive interface. Statistical analysis involved one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test for multiple comparisons of μTBS, DC, and resin tag (p < 0.05). Group 3 (2% CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs-UA) presented the maximum resin tag length (111.21 ± 2.81 μm) and highest μTBS (15.47 ± 0.88 MPa). However, the lowest bond integrity score (12.64 ± 0.5 MPa) and (76.29 ± 1.69 μm) was presented by Group 1 (0% NPs-UA) (12.64 ± 0.5 MPa) samples. Group 3 (2% CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs-UA) (68.54 ± 6.77) adhesive showed DC comparable to 2% CuONPs-UA (67.58 ± 9.65) and UA-unmodified (74.33 ± 8.59) (p > 0.05). The UA enhanced with CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs and CuONPs can be viewed as a viable option, given its improved μTBS and resin tag length as observed through SEM. Furthermore, the modification of UA using CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs and CuONPs exhibits a DC comparable to that of the unmodified adhesive control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microscopy Research and Technique
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.70030
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Dentin‐Adhesive Interface of a Nanoparticle‐Enhanced Universal Adhesive Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Its Impact on μTBS and Degree of Conversion

Madiha Pirvani, Shaheryar Shafqat, Syed Hussain Askary, Muhammad Omar Niaz et al.
Microscopy Research and Technique
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluating the Dentin‐Adhesive Interface of a Nanoparticle‐Enhanced Universal Adhesive Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Its Impact on μTBS and Degree of Conversion

Madiha Pirvani, Shaheryar Shafqat, Syed Hussain Askary, Muhammad Omar Niaz, Azmat Ali Khan, Asma Fozia Qureshi, Amer M. Alanazi
article en

Abstract

Evaluation of the effects of various nanoparticles (NPs), titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>), cerium dioxide (CeO<sub>2</sub>), and copper oxide (CuO), when incorporated into universal adhesive (UA), on the micro tensile bond strength (μTBS), degree of conversion (DC), adhesive interface, and resin tag assessment. Before incorporating nanoparticles (NPs) into UA, elemental analysis was conducted on all NP types using energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The study involved 48 intact human molars, divided into four groups based on UA modification with different NPs: Group 1 (Control), Group 2 (TiO<sub>2</sub>NPs), Group 3 (CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs), and Group 4 (CuONPs). Samples were restored with composite and light cured. All specimens underwent 10,000 cycles of thermocycling for aging, followed by μTBS testing and failure mode evaluation using a universal testing machine and stereomicroscope. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was employed to assess the DC. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to evaluate resin tag length and examine the adhesive interface. Statistical analysis involved one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test for multiple comparisons of μTBS, DC, and resin tag (p < 0.05). Group 3 (2% CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs-UA) presented the maximum resin tag length (111.21 ± 2.81 μm) and highest μTBS (15.47 ± 0.88 MPa). However, the lowest bond integrity score (12.64 ± 0.5 MPa) and (76.29 ± 1.69 μm) was presented by Group 1 (0% NPs-UA) (12.64 ± 0.5 MPa) samples. Group 3 (2% CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs-UA) (68.54 ± 6.77) adhesive showed DC comparable to 2% CuONPs-UA (67.58 ± 9.65) and UA-unmodified (74.33 ± 8.59) (p > 0.05). The UA enhanced with CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs and CuONPs can be viewed as a viable option, given its improved μTBS and resin tag length as observed through SEM. Furthermore, the modification of UA using CeO<sub>2</sub>NPs and CuONPs exhibits a DC comparable to that of the unmodified adhesive control.

Microscopy Research and TechniqueVol. 88(11)
Fatima Jinnah Dental College (PK), King Saud University (SA), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), National University of Medical Sciences (PK), Army Medical College (PK), University of Memphis (US)
King Saud University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.