Understanding the Context of the “Natural Inclinations” and the Natural Law: Thomas Aquinas’s Use of Cicero’s De officiis in Summa theologiae I-II, Q. 94, A. 2

Abstract: The thesis of this article is that, in his famous discussion of the natural law in ST I-II, q. 94, a. 2, Thomas borrowed the three “inclinations” he mentions there from Cicero’s De officiis 1.4.11-13. I argue that Thomas uses them as a structuring device to catalogue and distinguish different levels or kinds of natural law. This is his version of the lists of the different kinds or levels of ius naturale that were ubiquitous in the works of the canon lawyers in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Reading Thomas’s text in the context of Cicero’s discussion in book 1 of De officiis and in the context of the discussions of ius naturale among the decretists of the twelfth century and theologians of the thirteenth helps us to understand his concern to establish the proper sense of “nature” appropriate to any proper understanding of human natural law. It also helps us understand why it is wrong to try to turn the natural law into a separate moral system apart from consideration of grace, the cardinal and theological virtues, and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2025.a964211
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Context of the “Natural Inclinations” and the Natural Law: Thomas Aquinas’s Use of Cicero’s De officiis in Summa theologiae I-II, Q. 94, A. 2

Randall B. Smith
The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

Understanding the Context of the “Natural Inclinations” and the Natural Law: Thomas Aquinas’s Use of Cicero’s De officiis in Summa theologiae I-II, Q. 94, A. 2

Randall B. Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The thesis of this article is that, in his famous discussion of the natural law in ST I-II, q. 94, a. 2, Thomas borrowed the three “inclinations” he mentions there from Cicero’s De officiis 1.4.11-13. I argue that Thomas uses them as a structuring device to catalogue and distinguish different levels or kinds of natural law. This is his version of the lists of the different kinds or levels of ius naturale that were ubiquitous in the works of the canon lawyers in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Reading Thomas’s text in the context of Cicero’s discussion in book 1 of De officiis and in the context of the discussions of ius naturale among the decretists of the twelfth century and theologians of the thirteenth helps us to understand his concern to establish the proper sense of “nature” appropriate to any proper understanding of human natural law. It also helps us understand why it is wrong to try to turn the natural law into a separate moral system apart from consideration of grace, the cardinal and theological virtues, and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly ReviewVol. 89(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.