The Effectiveness of 21st Century Competency Assessment Model and HOTS in Improving Writing Skills: An Experimental Research

The Research examines the effectiveness of a 21st Century Competency and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based writing assessment model in improving students' writing skills. The research employs an experimental design with two groups: an experimental group that participated in HOTS and 21st Century Competency-based learning, and a control group that followed conventional learning methods. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test evaluations to measure students' writing abilities across various text types, such as observation report texts, biographies, procedures, explanations, editorials, and articles. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24 and Microsoft Excel. The findings reveal a significant difference in writing skills between the group using the HOTS and 21st Century Competency-based assessment model and the control group. The Mann-Whitney test indicated that the significance value for the post-test across all text types was 0.000, which is less than 0.05, meaning H0 was rejected and a significant difference was observed. The HOTS-based learning approach proved to be more effective in enhancing students' writing skills, as it encourages critical and creative thinking, enabling students to produce more structured and meaningful writing. These findings support the theory that a 21st Century Competency-based approach, which integrates higher-order thinking skills, can lead to significant improvements in students' writing abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language Teaching and Research
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1604.07
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of 21st Century Competency Assessment Model and HOTS in Improving Writing Skills: An Experimental Research

Diena San Fauziya, Teti Sobari, Ika Mustika, Wikanengsih et al.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research
Educational Methods and Outcomes
article

The Effectiveness of 21st Century Competency Assessment Model and HOTS in Improving Writing Skills: An Experimental Research

Diena San Fauziya, Teti Sobari, Ika Mustika, Wikanengsih, Suhud Aryana
article en

Abstract

The Research examines the effectiveness of a 21st Century Competency and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-based writing assessment model in improving students' writing skills. The research employs an experimental design with two groups: an experimental group that participated in HOTS and 21st Century Competency-based learning, and a control group that followed conventional learning methods. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test evaluations to measure students' writing abilities across various text types, such as observation report texts, biographies, procedures, explanations, editorials, and articles. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 24 and Microsoft Excel. The findings reveal a significant difference in writing skills between the group using the HOTS and 21st Century Competency-based assessment model and the control group. The Mann-Whitney test indicated that the significance value for the post-test across all text types was 0.000, which is less than 0.05, meaning H0 was rejected and a significant difference was observed. The HOTS-based learning approach proved to be more effective in enhancing students' writing skills, as it encourages critical and creative thinking, enabling students to produce more structured and meaningful writing. These findings support the theory that a 21st Century Competency-based approach, which integrates higher-order thinking skills, can lead to significant improvements in students' writing abilities.

Journal of Language Teaching and ResearchVol. 16(4)
Siliwangi University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Educational Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.