Designing for and investigating elementary students’ cognitive flexibility, science, and literacy achievement in project-based science learning

Abstract We describe scientific understanding in a project-based learning (PBL) environment as the context for developing cognitive flexibility through social constructivism and meaningful problem solving, which we argue are required for science learning as described in reform documents. Cognitive flexibility enables students to respond to ill-structured problems by recognizing different ideas as possible solution pathways. Building on research showing that cognitive flexibility supports literacy achievement through adaptive decision-making, we focus on instruction that engages students in seeking multiple scientific ideas to address the same phenomenon or problem in collaborative settings. We developed and validated an instrument to measure cognitive flexibility, designed in conjunction with our PBL curriculum, and examined its predictive relationship with science and literacy achievement among 781 diverse third graders. Using expert review and confirmatory factor analysis, we established the instrument’s validity and reliability. Results show that cognitive flexibility significantly predicts science achievement (β = .269, p <.001) and literacy achievement (β = .489, p <.001), with consistent effects across student demographic groups. Our findings suggest that PBL offers authentic opportunities for students to develop cognitive flexibility alongside scientific understanding and literacy. We discuss implications for designing integrated learning environments that promote cognitive flexibility as a critical skill for problem-solving in science and literacy contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00131-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing for and investigating elementary students’ cognitive flexibility, science, and literacy achievement in project-based science learning

Susan Codere Kelly, Emily C. Adah Miller, Joseph Krajcik, Tingting Li et al.
1 citations
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
article

Designing for and investigating elementary students’ cognitive flexibility, science, and literacy achievement in project-based science learning

Susan Codere Kelly, Emily C. Adah Miller, Joseph Krajcik, Tingting Li, I‐Chien Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We describe scientific understanding in a project-based learning (PBL) environment as the context for developing cognitive flexibility through social constructivism and meaningful problem solving, which we argue are required for science learning as described in reform documents. Cognitive flexibility enables students to respond to ill-structured problems by recognizing different ideas as possible solution pathways. Building on research showing that cognitive flexibility supports literacy achievement through adaptive decision-making, we focus on instruction that engages students in seeking multiple scientific ideas to address the same phenomenon or problem in collaborative settings. We developed and validated an instrument to measure cognitive flexibility, designed in conjunction with our PBL curriculum, and examined its predictive relationship with science and literacy achievement among 781 diverse third graders. Using expert review and confirmatory factor analysis, we established the instrument’s validity and reliability. Results show that cognitive flexibility significantly predicts science achievement (β = .269, p <.001) and literacy achievement (β = .489, p <.001), with consistent effects across student demographic groups. Our findings suggest that PBL offers authentic opportunities for students to develop cognitive flexibility alongside scientific understanding and literacy. We discuss implications for designing integrated learning environments that promote cognitive flexibility as a critical skill for problem-solving in science and literacy contexts.

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchVol. 7(1)
University of Georgia (US), Washington State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.