The PIEE Cycle: A Structured Framework for Red Teaming Large Language Models in Clinical Decision-Making

The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare presents significant opportunities, but also critical risks related to patient safety, accuracy, and ethical alignment. Despite these concerns, no standardized framework exists for systematically evaluating and stress testing LLM behavior in clinical decision-making. The PIEE cycle-Planning and Preparation, Information Gathering and Prompt Generation, Execution, and Evaluation-is a structured red-teaming framework developed specifically to address artificial intelligence (AI) safety risks in healthcare decision-making. PIEE enables clinicians and informatics teams to simulate adversarial prompts, including jailbreaking, social engineering, and distractor attacks, to stress-test language models in real-world clinical scenarios. Model performance is evaluated using specific metrics such as true positive and false positive rates for detecting harmful content, hallucination rates measured through adapted TruthfulQA scoring, safety and reliability assessments, bias detection via adapted BBQ benchmarks, and ethical evaluation using structured Likert-based scoring rubrics. The framework is illustrated using examples from plastic surgery, but is adaptable across specialties, and is intended for use by all medical providers, regardless of their backgrounds or familiarity with artificial intelligence. While the framework is currently conceptual and validation is ongoing, PIEE provides a practical foundation for assessing the clinical reliability and ethical robustness of LLMs in medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070706
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The PIEE Cycle: A Structured Framework for Red Teaming Large Language Models in Clinical Decision-Making

Sahar Borna, Antonio J. Forte, Nadia G. Wood, Cui Tao et al.
2 citations
Bioengineering
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

The PIEE Cycle: A Structured Framework for Red Teaming Large Language Models in Clinical Decision-Making

Sahar Borna, Antonio J. Forte, Nadia G. Wood, Cui Tao, Cesar A. Gomez-Cabello, Syed Ali Haider, Ariana Genovese, Srinivasagam Prabha, Maissa Trabilsy, Narayanan Gopala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare presents significant opportunities, but also critical risks related to patient safety, accuracy, and ethical alignment. Despite these concerns, no standardized framework exists for systematically evaluating and stress testing LLM behavior in clinical decision-making. The PIEE cycle-Planning and Preparation, Information Gathering and Prompt Generation, Execution, and Evaluation-is a structured red-teaming framework developed specifically to address artificial intelligence (AI) safety risks in healthcare decision-making. PIEE enables clinicians and informatics teams to simulate adversarial prompts, including jailbreaking, social engineering, and distractor attacks, to stress-test language models in real-world clinical scenarios. Model performance is evaluated using specific metrics such as true positive and false positive rates for detecting harmful content, hallucination rates measured through adapted TruthfulQA scoring, safety and reliability assessments, bias detection via adapted BBQ benchmarks, and ethical evaluation using structured Likert-based scoring rubrics. The framework is illustrated using examples from plastic surgery, but is adaptable across specialties, and is intended for use by all medical providers, regardless of their backgrounds or familiarity with artificial intelligence. While the framework is currently conceptual and validation is ongoing, PIEE provides a practical foundation for assessing the clinical reliability and ethical robustness of LLMs in medicine.

BioengineeringVol. 12(7)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Mayo Clinic
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.