AN ONTOLOGY OF ORGANIZED CRIME: A Meta-Analytical Framework and Enforcement Implications

The author, Stephen Schneider, undertakes a holistic analysis of the numerous definitions, descriptions, and concepts that represent the criminological construct referred to as “organized crime.” He provides a critical analysis of those researchers who have trafficked in ethnic and racial monikers that dominates much of the earlier research on “organized crime,” specifically singling out the late sociologist, Donald Cressey. Recognizing the difficulty in applying “scientific methods” to the study of “organized crime,” Schneider acknowledges its fluid and ever-changing nature makes it susceptible to the ideological and the “less than objective” lenses of the researchers who choose to make this an academic endeavor. He leaves us with an escalating paradigm for those tasked with containing the pernicious effects of organized crime. A paradigm, unfortunately, which is dependent upon the political will, skilled resources, and integrity of those who are often corrupted by the criminal syndicates who comprise “organized crime.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Illicit Economies and Development
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.309
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AN ONTOLOGY OF ORGANIZED CRIME: A Meta-Analytical Framework and Enforcement Implications

Frederick T. Martens, Stephen H. Schneider
Journal of Illicit Economies and Development
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

AN ONTOLOGY OF ORGANIZED CRIME: A Meta-Analytical Framework and Enforcement Implications

Frederick T. Martens, Stephen H. Schneider
article en

Abstract

The author, Stephen Schneider, undertakes a holistic analysis of the numerous definitions, descriptions, and concepts that represent the criminological construct referred to as “organized crime.” He provides a critical analysis of those researchers who have trafficked in ethnic and racial monikers that dominates much of the earlier research on “organized crime,” specifically singling out the late sociologist, Donald Cressey. Recognizing the difficulty in applying “scientific methods” to the study of “organized crime,” Schneider acknowledges its fluid and ever-changing nature makes it susceptible to the ideological and the “less than objective” lenses of the researchers who choose to make this an academic endeavor. He leaves us with an escalating paradigm for those tasked with containing the pernicious effects of organized crime. A paradigm, unfortunately, which is dependent upon the political will, skilled resources, and integrity of those who are often corrupted by the criminal syndicates who comprise “organized crime.”

Journal of Illicit Economies and DevelopmentVol. 7(1)
Fordham University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AN ONTOLOGY OF ORGANIZED CRIME: A Meta-Analytical Framework and Enforcement Implications — Frederick T. Martens, Stephen H. Schneider · Journal of Illicit Economies and Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS