Self-citation in countries: comparisons between the global south and north using the OpenAlex Database

Abstract: This paper aims to examine self-citation rates in developed and developing countries, as well as across the Global North and South, and explore their relationship with scientific productivity. Methods: The study utilized data from the OpenAlex database, encompassing 12.3 million articles from 50 countries published between 2020 and 2023. Self-citation rates were calculated at the country and socioeconomic region levels, based on the proportion of articles citing works originating from the same country. Results: Developing countries exhibited higher adjusted self-citation rates and stronger correlations between scientific output and self-citation. In contrast, developed countries showed weaker correlations between productivity and citations, with their citations being less focused on domestic works. While Global South countries account for 42.6% of total scientific output, their contributions represent only 10.4% of references in publications from developed countries, reflecting a concentration of citations among Global North nations. Conclusion: Despite the increasing contribution of developing countries to global scientific output and their growing representation in the OpenAlex database, these countries display high self-citation rates. Moreover, citations from developed countries remain largely concentrated within their own group, underscoring persistent inequalities in the flow of knowledge between the Global North and South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Em Questão
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-5245.31.144735
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-citation in countries: comparisons between the global south and north using the OpenAlex Database

João de Melo Maricato, Sandro Barbosa de Oliveira
Em Questão
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Self-citation in countries: comparisons between the global south and north using the OpenAlex Database

João de Melo Maricato, Sandro Barbosa de Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to examine self-citation rates in developed and developing countries, as well as across the Global North and South, and explore their relationship with scientific productivity. Methods: The study utilized data from the OpenAlex database, encompassing 12.3 million articles from 50 countries published between 2020 and 2023. Self-citation rates were calculated at the country and socioeconomic region levels, based on the proportion of articles citing works originating from the same country. Results: Developing countries exhibited higher adjusted self-citation rates and stronger correlations between scientific output and self-citation. In contrast, developed countries showed weaker correlations between productivity and citations, with their citations being less focused on domestic works. While Global South countries account for 42.6% of total scientific output, their contributions represent only 10.4% of references in publications from developed countries, reflecting a concentration of citations among Global North nations. Conclusion: Despite the increasing contribution of developing countries to global scientific output and their growing representation in the OpenAlex database, these countries display high self-citation rates. Moreover, citations from developed countries remain largely concentrated within their own group, underscoring persistent inequalities in the flow of knowledge between the Global North and South.

Em QuestãoVol. 31
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.