Augmented Resting Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability in Young, Healthy, Hispanic Men

Hispanic Americans (HA) are at a higher risk for metabolic syndrome and diabetes compared to other racial groups in the United States, conditions that are well established risk factors for cardiovascular disease progression. Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) is a known predictor of cardiovascular risk. However, racial differences in beat-to-beat BPV between HA and non-Hispanic white (WH) men have not been investigated. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that young, healthy, HA men have greater resting beat-to-beat BPV compared to healthy age and body mass index matched WH men. We studied 8 young healthy HA men (23 ± 3 years, 24.2 ± 2.3 kg/m 2 , mean ± standard deviation) and 10 young healthy WH men (22 ± 3 years, P = 0.574; 24.1 ± 3.1 kg/m 2 , P = 0.948). During ten minutes of quiet supine rest, beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (BP; finger photoplethysmography) was continuously recorded and brachial automated sphygmomanometry was used to verify beat-to-beat BP measurements (Welch Allyn). Stroke volume (SV) was estimated using the Modelflow method, then cardiac output (CO = SV x Heart rate) and total peripheral resistance (TPR = MAP / CO) were calculated. Standard deviation (SD), range, coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) were calculated for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), mean arterial BP (MAP), CO and TPR. Resting SBP (HA: 116 ± 7 mmHg; WH: 118 ± 6 mmHg; P = 0.509), DBP (HA: 67 ± 4 mmHg; WH: 65 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.432), and MAP (HA: 83 ± 4 mmHg; WH: 83 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.830), were not different between groups. Beat-to-beat MAP SD (HA: 5.3 ± 1.3 mmHg; WH: 3.6 ± 0.9 mmHg; P = 0.004), range (HA: 30 ± 6 mmHg; WH: 20 ± 4 mmHg; P = 0.001), CV (HA: 6.4 ± 1.3 %; WH: 4.4 ± 1.1 %; P = 0.002), and ARV (HA: 1.4 ± 0.3; WH: 1.1 ± 0.3; P = 0.033) were all higher in HA men compared to WH men. Likewise, all SBP and DBP beat-to-beat variability measures were higher in HA men compared to WH men (all p < 0.05). HA men also had higher TPR SD (HA: 1.3 ± 0.2 mmHg/min/L; WH: 0.9 ± 0.2 mmHg/min/L; P = 0.009) and range (HA: 9 ± 2 mmHg/min/L; WH: 6 ± 2 mmHg; P = 0.009) compared to WH men, however there were no differences in any CO variability measures (P > 0.05). Despite normal resting BP, these preliminary data suggest that beat-to-beat BPV is higher in HA men compared to WH men, which was accompanied by an augmented TPR variability. This heightened BP and TPR variability in HA men warrants additional investigation. This work was supported by the College of Nursing and Health Innovation. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.2025.40.s1.1068
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmented Resting Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability in Young, Healthy, Hispanic Men

Ziba Taherzadeh, Benjamin E. Young, Taha Alhalimi, Paul J. Fadel et al.
Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Augmented Resting Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability in Young, Healthy, Hispanic Men

Ziba Taherzadeh, Benjamin E. Young, Taha Alhalimi, Paul J. Fadel, Ashlesha Dalve, Jasdeep Kaur, Zachary R Oldham, Claire E. Trotter
article en

Abstract

Hispanic Americans (HA) are at a higher risk for metabolic syndrome and diabetes compared to other racial groups in the United States, conditions that are well established risk factors for cardiovascular disease progression. Beat-to-beat blood pressure variability (BPV) is a known predictor of cardiovascular risk. However, racial differences in beat-to-beat BPV between HA and non-Hispanic white (WH) men have not been investigated. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that young, healthy, HA men have greater resting beat-to-beat BPV compared to healthy age and body mass index matched WH men. We studied 8 young healthy HA men (23 ± 3 years, 24.2 ± 2.3 kg/m 2 , mean ± standard deviation) and 10 young healthy WH men (22 ± 3 years, P = 0.574; 24.1 ± 3.1 kg/m 2 , P = 0.948). During ten minutes of quiet supine rest, beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure (BP; finger photoplethysmography) was continuously recorded and brachial automated sphygmomanometry was used to verify beat-to-beat BP measurements (Welch Allyn). Stroke volume (SV) was estimated using the Modelflow method, then cardiac output (CO = SV x Heart rate) and total peripheral resistance (TPR = MAP / CO) were calculated. Standard deviation (SD), range, coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) were calculated for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), mean arterial BP (MAP), CO and TPR. Resting SBP (HA: 116 ± 7 mmHg; WH: 118 ± 6 mmHg; P = 0.509), DBP (HA: 67 ± 4 mmHg; WH: 65 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.432), and MAP (HA: 83 ± 4 mmHg; WH: 83 ± 5 mmHg; P = 0.830), were not different between groups. Beat-to-beat MAP SD (HA: 5.3 ± 1.3 mmHg; WH: 3.6 ± 0.9 mmHg; P = 0.004), range (HA: 30 ± 6 mmHg; WH: 20 ± 4 mmHg; P = 0.001), CV (HA: 6.4 ± 1.3 %; WH: 4.4 ± 1.1 %; P = 0.002), and ARV (HA: 1.4 ± 0.3; WH: 1.1 ± 0.3; P = 0.033) were all higher in HA men compared to WH men. Likewise, all SBP and DBP beat-to-beat variability measures were higher in HA men compared to WH men (all p < 0.05). HA men also had higher TPR SD (HA: 1.3 ± 0.2 mmHg/min/L; WH: 0.9 ± 0.2 mmHg/min/L; P = 0.009) and range (HA: 9 ± 2 mmHg/min/L; WH: 6 ± 2 mmHg; P = 0.009) compared to WH men, however there were no differences in any CO variability measures (P > 0.05). Despite normal resting BP, these preliminary data suggest that beat-to-beat BPV is higher in HA men compared to WH men, which was accompanied by an augmented TPR variability. This heightened BP and TPR variability in HA men warrants additional investigation. This work was supported by the College of Nursing and Health Innovation. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

PhysiologyVol. 40(S1)
University of North Texas (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.