O powództwie o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego w sprawach alimentacyjnych – Glosa krytyczna do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 czerwca 2021 r., w sprawie o sygnaturze akt: I CSKP 55/21

The subject of this paper is the judgment of the Supreme Court – Resolution of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber dated June 10, 2021 (case reference: I CSKP 55/21), in which the Supreme Court expressed the view that all cases concerning alimony, including those in which the debtor disputes the existence of an alimony obligation within a motion to set aside the enforceable title, must be considered as alimony cases within the meaning of Article 3982 § 2 point 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the judgment of the Supreme Court and to show that, in the light of the existing legal provisions, the Supreme Court's position is too broad, since actions to set aside an enforceable title for alimony cannot be classified as alimony cases in which an appeal in cassation is inadmissible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRAWO i WIĘŹ
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi53.755
Primary Topic
Polish Law and Legal System
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O powództwie o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego w sprawach alimentacyjnych – Glosa krytyczna do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 czerwca 2021 r., w sprawie o sygnaturze akt: I CSKP 55/21

Paulina Woś
PRAWO i WIĘŹ
Polish Law and Legal System
article

O powództwie o pozbawienie wykonalności tytułu wykonawczego w sprawach alimentacyjnych – Glosa krytyczna do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 czerwca 2021 r., w sprawie o sygnaturze akt: I CSKP 55/21

Paulina Woś
article en

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the judgment of the Supreme Court – Resolution of the Supreme Court – Civil Chamber dated June 10, 2021 (case reference: I CSKP 55/21), in which the Supreme Court expressed the view that all cases concerning alimony, including those in which the debtor disputes the existence of an alimony obligation within a motion to set aside the enforceable title, must be considered as alimony cases within the meaning of Article 3982 § 2 point 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the judgment of the Supreme Court and to show that, in the light of the existing legal provisions, the Supreme Court's position is too broad, since actions to set aside an enforceable title for alimony cannot be classified as alimony cases in which an appeal in cassation is inadmissible.

PRAWO i WIĘŹVol. 53(6)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Polish Law and Legal System
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.