A Comparative Prospective on the Individualization of Criminal Sentencing

The purpose of this paper is intended to make a theoretical and practical analysis of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in criminal law, their importance in relation to the principle of individualization of punishment as well as their importance in relation to determining the right criminal sentencing. This analysis is based on a mixed methodology, including descriptive, analytical and comparative methods by using doctrines, legislation and practice of Albanian and foreign courts as a source of data. This paper also aims to highlight the real problems related to the understanding of the theoretical importance of mitigating and aggravating circumstances and also their implementation by the Albanian courts. The main focus is on proposing a practical and unified solution to the applicability of these circumstances, taking the lead from foreign jurisdictions, primarely based on common law systems. Specifically, this paper proposes the creation of a unified methodology for the practical implementation of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in the Albanian legislation as a guide for the Albanian courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRAWO i WIĘŹ
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi54.859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Prospective on the Individualization of Criminal Sentencing

Ivas Konini, Iv Rokaj
1 citations
PRAWO i WIĘŹ
Criminal Law and Evidence
15.98
article

A Comparative Prospective on the Individualization of Criminal Sentencing

Ivas Konini, Iv Rokaj
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is intended to make a theoretical and practical analysis of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in criminal law, their importance in relation to the principle of individualization of punishment as well as their importance in relation to determining the right criminal sentencing. This analysis is based on a mixed methodology, including descriptive, analytical and comparative methods by using doctrines, legislation and practice of Albanian and foreign courts as a source of data. This paper also aims to highlight the real problems related to the understanding of the theoretical importance of mitigating and aggravating circumstances and also their implementation by the Albanian courts. The main focus is on proposing a practical and unified solution to the applicability of these circumstances, taking the lead from foreign jurisdictions, primarely based on common law systems. Specifically, this paper proposes the creation of a unified methodology for the practical implementation of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in the Albanian legislation as a guide for the Albanian courts.

PRAWO i WIĘŹVol. 54(1)
University of Tirana (AL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Criminal Law and Evidence
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.