Trade and biodiversity loss: disentangling the complexities for effective policy action

There is a growing policy emphasis on “harnessing trade for biodiversity” and “biodiversity-friendly trade.” However, achieving this requires a full understanding of the complexities involved. Biodiversity is a complex concept that encompasses a wide range of factors and influences. It cannot be measured in a straightforward manner and its evaluation depends on the specific context, scale, and time frame. Additionally, there are inherent tensions between the benefits of trade and the importance of maintaining biodiversity. The pursuit of trade often leads to greater agrosystem specialization, intensification, and concentration, which can harm ecosystem functions. Indeed, it is important to avoid oversimplification and exercise caution in advocating for “biodiversity-friendly” production and trade. This article critically examines the idea of “harnessing trade for biodiversity” and scrutinizes the intricate interplay between trade and biodiversity. It approaches the topic from an interdisciplinary perspective, considering trade policy vis-à-vis commodity trade economics and social-ecological system frameworks. By linking trade policy to various approaches in the “beyond growth” debate, we present an overview of different pathways to reconcile trade and biodiversity, ranging from fundamental reform to incremental changes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-16124-300301
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade and biodiversity loss: disentangling the complexities for effective policy action

Gabi Sonderegger, Irène Musselli
1 citations
Ecology and Society
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
article

Trade and biodiversity loss: disentangling the complexities for effective policy action

Gabi Sonderegger, Irène Musselli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a growing policy emphasis on “harnessing trade for biodiversity” and “biodiversity-friendly trade.” However, achieving this requires a full understanding of the complexities involved. Biodiversity is a complex concept that encompasses a wide range of factors and influences. It cannot be measured in a straightforward manner and its evaluation depends on the specific context, scale, and time frame. Additionally, there are inherent tensions between the benefits of trade and the importance of maintaining biodiversity. The pursuit of trade often leads to greater agrosystem specialization, intensification, and concentration, which can harm ecosystem functions. Indeed, it is important to avoid oversimplification and exercise caution in advocating for “biodiversity-friendly” production and trade. This article critically examines the idea of “harnessing trade for biodiversity” and scrutinizes the intricate interplay between trade and biodiversity. It approaches the topic from an interdisciplinary perspective, considering trade policy vis-à-vis commodity trade economics and social-ecological system frameworks. By linking trade policy to various approaches in the “beyond growth” debate, we present an overview of different pathways to reconcile trade and biodiversity, ranging from fundamental reform to incremental changes.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 30(3)
Innovationsfonden, Joint Programming Initiative Water challenges for a changing world, Biodiversa+, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trade and biodiversity loss: disentangling the complexities for effective policy action — Gabi Sonderegger, Irène Musselli · Ecology and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS