A Meta-Logical Framework for the Equivalence of Syntactic and Semantic Theories

This paper introduces a meta-logical framework—based on the theory of institutions (a categorical version of abstract model theory)—to be used as a tool for the formalization of the two main views regarding the structure of scientific theories, namely the syntactic and the semantic views, as they have emerged from the relevant contemporary discussion. The formalization leads to a proof of the equivalence of the two views, which supports the claim that the two approaches are not really in tension. The proof is based on the Galois connection between classes of sentences and classes of models defined over some institution. First, the history of the syntactic–semantic debate is recalled and the theory of institutions formally introduced. Secondly, the notions of syntactic and semantic theories are formalized within the institution and their equivalence proved. Finally, the novelty of the proposed framework is highlighted with respect to existing formalizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophies
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies10040078
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-Logical Framework for the Equivalence of Syntactic and Semantic Theories

Nicola Angius, Maria Dimarogkona, Petros Stefaneas
Philosophies
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

A Meta-Logical Framework for the Equivalence of Syntactic and Semantic Theories

Nicola Angius, Maria Dimarogkona, Petros Stefaneas
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a meta-logical framework—based on the theory of institutions (a categorical version of abstract model theory)—to be used as a tool for the formalization of the two main views regarding the structure of scientific theories, namely the syntactic and the semantic views, as they have emerged from the relevant contemporary discussion. The formalization leads to a proof of the equivalence of the two views, which supports the claim that the two approaches are not really in tension. The proof is based on the Galois connection between classes of sentences and classes of models defined over some institution. First, the history of the syntactic–semantic debate is recalled and the theory of institutions formally introduced. Secondly, the notions of syntactic and semantic theories are formalized within the institution and their equivalence proved. Finally, the novelty of the proposed framework is highlighted with respect to existing formalizations.

PhilosophiesVol. 10(4)
University of Messina (IT), National Technical University of Athens (GR)
National Technical University of Athens
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Meta-Logical Framework for the Equivalence of Syntactic and Semantic Theories — Nicola Angius, Maria Dimarogkona, et al. · Philosophies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS