Are Disturbances in Mentalization Ability Similar Between Schizophrenic Patients and Borderline Personality Disorder Patients?

There is a growing interest in ToM performance among individuals with psychiatric disorders. However, the difference and the performance level between different diagnoses are unclear. Here, we compared the ToM abilities of schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SZaff), and borderline personality individuals (BPD) with healthy individuals. Individuals with SZ (n = 44), SZaff (n = 11), BPD (n = 11), and healthy individuals (n = 18) were recruited from Mazor Mental Health Center. All groups underwent the Reading Mind in the Eyes (RME) and the Faux Pas recognition test (FB) to assess TOM ability and completed empathy and autism questionnaires. The current results show that the three diagnostic groups performed worse in the RME and FB test compared to healthy individuals. However, women with BPD performed significantly better in ToM tasks than women with SZ and SZaff. Individuals with schizophrenia and BPD scored higher on the autism spectrum questionnaire, while all the diagnostic groups scored lower on the empathy quotient scale than healthy individuals. Finally, a positive correlation was found between ToM ability and empathy. Strikingly, our findings challenge the ability to use ToM as a differential clinical diagnostic tool, especially among men, and strengthen the correlation between decreased empathy and impaired ToM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry International
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030077
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Disturbances in Mentalization Ability Similar Between Schizophrenic Patients and Borderline Personality Disorder Patients?

Ido Peleg, Eilam Palzur, Idit Golani, Yaseen Awad-Igbaria et al.
1 citations
Psychiatry International
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
article

Are Disturbances in Mentalization Ability Similar Between Schizophrenic Patients and Borderline Personality Disorder Patients?

Ido Peleg, Eilam Palzur, Idit Golani, Yaseen Awad-Igbaria, Muhammad Abu-Alhiga, Alon Shamir, Tamar Peleg, Tair Bar, Essam Ikshaibon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a growing interest in ToM performance among individuals with psychiatric disorders. However, the difference and the performance level between different diagnoses are unclear. Here, we compared the ToM abilities of schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective (SZaff), and borderline personality individuals (BPD) with healthy individuals. Individuals with SZ (n = 44), SZaff (n = 11), BPD (n = 11), and healthy individuals (n = 18) were recruited from Mazor Mental Health Center. All groups underwent the Reading Mind in the Eyes (RME) and the Faux Pas recognition test (FB) to assess TOM ability and completed empathy and autism questionnaires. The current results show that the three diagnostic groups performed worse in the RME and FB test compared to healthy individuals. However, women with BPD performed significantly better in ToM tasks than women with SZ and SZaff. Individuals with schizophrenia and BPD scored higher on the autism spectrum questionnaire, while all the diagnostic groups scored lower on the empathy quotient scale than healthy individuals. Finally, a positive correlation was found between ToM ability and empathy. Strikingly, our findings challenge the ability to use ToM as a differential clinical diagnostic tool, especially among men, and strengthen the correlation between decreased empathy and impaired ToM.

Psychiatry InternationalVol. 6(3)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Braude College of Engineering Karmiel (IL), Western Galilee Hospital (IL), Mazor Mental Health Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.