Porcelain and Steel

This article examines the moment when American anticipations about Chinese economic growth turned decisively toward anxiety at a pivotal stage of the Cold War. It argues that perceptions of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) development initiatives, specifically the Great Leap Forward of 1958–1961, shaped the calculus of U.S. foreign policy strategy for the Pacific, and that orientalism was an integral component of the regional economic model championed by leading officials. Merging established racial and cultural tropes with anti-communist development theory, aka modernization, policymakers used economic hypotheses to wage geopolitical power. Resulting analyses simultaneously dismissed the prospect of Chinese development while expressing worry that the Great Leap could dangerously heighten PRC influence in the non-aligned world. To “teach” China, they prescribed a combination at the heart of liberal internationalism: massive capitalist development backed by military intervention. This response to the Great Leap Forward provides vital context for U.S. attempts to engage with the PRC during the 1960s even as American officials urged actions like the Asian Development Bank and escalation of war in Vietnam.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Historical Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2025.94.3.233
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Porcelain and Steel

Jian Mao
4 links
Pacific Historical Review
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Porcelain and Steel

Jian Mao
article en

Abstract

This article examines the moment when American anticipations about Chinese economic growth turned decisively toward anxiety at a pivotal stage of the Cold War. It argues that perceptions of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) development initiatives, specifically the Great Leap Forward of 1958–1961, shaped the calculus of U.S. foreign policy strategy for the Pacific, and that orientalism was an integral component of the regional economic model championed by leading officials. Merging established racial and cultural tropes with anti-communist development theory, aka modernization, policymakers used economic hypotheses to wage geopolitical power. Resulting analyses simultaneously dismissed the prospect of Chinese development while expressing worry that the Great Leap could dangerously heighten PRC influence in the non-aligned world. To “teach” China, they prescribed a combination at the heart of liberal internationalism: massive capitalist development backed by military intervention. This response to the Great Leap Forward provides vital context for U.S. attempts to engage with the PRC during the 1960s even as American officials urged actions like the Asian Development Bank and escalation of war in Vietnam.

Pacific Historical ReviewVol. 94(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.