ProLom Program for Probabilistic Location of Earthquakes Using Macroseismic and Instrumental Data

The article is devoted to addressing the critical issue of increasing the reliability of estimates of the parameters of seismic events that occurred during the formation of instrumental observational seismology. Catalogs of this period are characterized by an extremely limited set of instrumentally determined phases, but are accompanied by descriptions of observed macroseismic effects. Previously, the authors proposed a probabilistic method for determining the epicenters and magnitudes of earthquakes based on a joint analysis of their macroseismic and instrumental data. For software implementation of the method, the ProLom program (Probabilistic Locator by Macroseismics) was created. The input data of the program are the values of intensity data points (IDP’s) on the MSK-64 scale and the coordinates of points where the earthquake was observed with these intensities, as well as the arrival times of seismic phases from the bulletins of seismic stations and their coordinates. Based on instrumental and macroseismic data for the test earthquake of May 20, 1967, various combinations of initial data were prepared in order to assess the applicability of the method depending on the distance of seismic stations, the amount of macroseismic information (IDP’s), azimuthal coverage of the source points-intensity values and the range of variations in intensity values. The minimum (boundary) conditions for the applicability of the method were identified: the presence of seismic stations, regardless of the number, at a distance of up to 2000 km from the epicenter and recording of at least two seismic phases, at least 7 IDP’s, and azimuthal coverage of the source with points-intensity values of at least 155°.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismic Instruments
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923925700227
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ProLom Program for Probabilistic Location of Earthquakes Using Macroseismic and Instrumental Data

А. Н. Морозов, N. V. Vaganova, А. В. Федоров, В. Э. Асминг
Seismic Instruments
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

ProLom Program for Probabilistic Location of Earthquakes Using Macroseismic and Instrumental Data

А. Н. Морозов, N. V. Vaganova, А. В. Федоров, В. Э. Асминг
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to addressing the critical issue of increasing the reliability of estimates of the parameters of seismic events that occurred during the formation of instrumental observational seismology. Catalogs of this period are characterized by an extremely limited set of instrumentally determined phases, but are accompanied by descriptions of observed macroseismic effects. Previously, the authors proposed a probabilistic method for determining the epicenters and magnitudes of earthquakes based on a joint analysis of their macroseismic and instrumental data. For software implementation of the method, the ProLom program (Probabilistic Locator by Macroseismics) was created. The input data of the program are the values of intensity data points (IDP’s) on the MSK-64 scale and the coordinates of points where the earthquake was observed with these intensities, as well as the arrival times of seismic phases from the bulletins of seismic stations and their coordinates. Based on instrumental and macroseismic data for the test earthquake of May 20, 1967, various combinations of initial data were prepared in order to assess the applicability of the method depending on the distance of seismic stations, the amount of macroseismic information (IDP’s), azimuthal coverage of the source points-intensity values and the range of variations in intensity values. The minimum (boundary) conditions for the applicability of the method were identified: the presence of seismic stations, regardless of the number, at a distance of up to 2000 km from the epicenter and recording of at least two seismic phases, at least 7 IDP’s, and azimuthal coverage of the source with points-intensity values of at least 155°.

Seismic InstrumentsVol. 61(2)
Northern (Arctic) Federal University (RU), Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Geophysical Survey (RU), Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth (RU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.