Legal frameworks for mass terrorism: the October 7th attack and implications for security law

Abstract This article discusses the legal ramifications posed by mass terrorist attacks, considering the widespread legal discourse unfolded by Hamas’s attack on 7 October 2023, on the state of Israel. While focusing on the challenges presented to existing legal frameworks, the article evaluates the efficacy of current theoretical approaches. It provides pragmatic guidelines for establishing a specialized and cohesive legal framework. Through critical analysis of relevant legal principles and structures, the article addresses the unique evidentiary and procedural obstacles arising from the unprecedented scale and nature of those attacks, including the systematic use of sexual violence. By proposing a hybrid legal model that balances security imperatives with human rights protections, this research contributes to the ongoing development of effective and principled legal responses to mass terrorism. It suggests principles for establishing a specialized legal framework while addressing the distinct evidentiary and procedural obstacles arising from the unprecedented scale, brutality, and number of crimes committed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Conflict and Security Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kraf011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal frameworks for mass terrorism: the October 7th attack and implications for security law

Shai Farber, Ofek Efraim Alaluf
1 citations
Journal of Conflict and Security Law
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

Legal frameworks for mass terrorism: the October 7th attack and implications for security law

Shai Farber, Ofek Efraim Alaluf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the legal ramifications posed by mass terrorist attacks, considering the widespread legal discourse unfolded by Hamas’s attack on 7 October 2023, on the state of Israel. While focusing on the challenges presented to existing legal frameworks, the article evaluates the efficacy of current theoretical approaches. It provides pragmatic guidelines for establishing a specialized and cohesive legal framework. Through critical analysis of relevant legal principles and structures, the article addresses the unique evidentiary and procedural obstacles arising from the unprecedented scale and nature of those attacks, including the systematic use of sexual violence. By proposing a hybrid legal model that balances security imperatives with human rights protections, this research contributes to the ongoing development of effective and principled legal responses to mass terrorism. It suggests principles for establishing a specialized legal framework while addressing the distinct evidentiary and procedural obstacles arising from the unprecedented scale, brutality, and number of crimes committed.

Journal of Conflict and Security LawVol. 30(2)
Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.