Evaluation of SBCF and CCF Forming in Complex Shapes via a Unified Defect Scoring Index

Stretch broken carbon fiber (SBCF) offers enhanced formability as compared to continuous carbon fiber (CCF). However, robust, quantitative evaluation of forming defects remains a challenge. This study introduces a unified formability index (UFI) that integrates multiple defect types, including texture anomalies, bridging, wrinkling, thickness variation, spring-back, and resin distribution variation (RDV), into a single weighted score. Each defect is ranked on a scale of 0-5 using normalized metrics with a tunable parameter, α, allowing users to balance defect magnitude and frequency as desired. The full scoring pipeline is demonstrated for texture defects using measured data, while normalized legacy scores from previous work are used for non-texture defects to enable complete formability index computation. Case studies on three laminates illustrate how variations in α affect both texture scoring and the overall formability index and demonstrate the geometry-agnostic nature of the updated ranking and UFI systems. This framework maintains compatibility with existing evaluations while offering improved resolution, consistency, and scalability for assessing laminate quality across complex geometries.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0081-2025-408
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of SBCF and CCF Forming in Complex Shapes via a Unified Defect Scoring Index

Cecily Ryan, Jared Nelson, Douglas Cairns, C. Ridgard et al.
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Evaluation of SBCF and CCF Forming in Complex Shapes via a Unified Defect Scoring Index

Cecily Ryan, Jared Nelson, Douglas Cairns, C. Ridgard, C. B. Williams
article en

Abstract

Stretch broken carbon fiber (SBCF) offers enhanced formability as compared to continuous carbon fiber (CCF). However, robust, quantitative evaluation of forming defects remains a challenge. This study introduces a unified formability index (UFI) that integrates multiple defect types, including texture anomalies, bridging, wrinkling, thickness variation, spring-back, and resin distribution variation (RDV), into a single weighted score. Each defect is ranked on a scale of 0-5 using normalized metrics with a tunable parameter, α, allowing users to balance defect magnitude and frequency as desired. The full scoring pipeline is demonstrated for texture defects using measured data, while normalized legacy scores from previous work are used for non-texture defects to enable complete formability index computation. Case studies on three laminates illustrate how variations in α affect both texture scoring and the overall formability index and demonstrate the geometry-agnostic nature of the updated ranking and UFI systems. This framework maintains compatibility with existing evaluations while offering improved resolution, consistency, and scalability for assessing laminate quality across complex geometries.

Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of SBCF and CCF Forming in Complex Shapes via a Unified Defect Scoring Index — Cecily Ryan, Jared Nelson, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS