Financial fraud in Chinese accounting firms explained by fraud hexagon theory

This study investigates the applicability of the Fraud Hexagon Theory (S.C.C.O.R.E. Theory) in explaining financial fraud within Chinese accounting firms, addressing a critical gap in understanding how Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, Rationalization, and Ego (S.C.C.O.R.E.) influence fraudulent behavior in this context. Employing a quantitative approach, we collected data from 238 professionals in Chinese accounting firms via structured questionnaires, ensuring ethical compliance through anonymized responses and informed consent. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was utilized to analyze the relationships between the six fraud determinants and their interaction with Corporate Governance as a moderating variable. Key findings reveal that Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, and Ego exhibit significant positive effects on Fraud Behavior, while Rationalization showed no statistical significance. Notably, Corporate Governance negatively moderates the relationship between Opportunity and Fraud Behavior, suggesting that robust governance mechanisms can mitigate exploitable opportunities. This study contributes empirically by validating the Fraud Hexagon Theory in China’s unique institutional and cultural setting, contrasting with prior Western-centric studies, and offers actionable insights for policymakers and accounting firms to refine anti-fraud frameworks. Practically, the results underscore the need for ethics training targeting Ego-driven rationalizations and regulatory reforms to strengthen governance oversight. Methodologically, the research advances fraud literature by integrating SEM with a context-specific moderating analysis, addressing limitations in traditional linear models. Ethical considerations, including participant confidentiality and voluntary participation, were rigorously upheld throughout the study. These findings provide theoretical and practical guidance for corporate managers, regulators, and educators in combating financial fraud and fostering professional integrity in China’s rapidly evolving financial sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025579
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial fraud in Chinese accounting firms explained by fraud hexagon theory

Tian Lan, Y. V. Lakshmana Rao
1 citations
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

Financial fraud in Chinese accounting firms explained by fraud hexagon theory

Tian Lan, Y. V. Lakshmana Rao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the applicability of the Fraud Hexagon Theory (S.C.C.O.R.E. Theory) in explaining financial fraud within Chinese accounting firms, addressing a critical gap in understanding how Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, Rationalization, and Ego (S.C.C.O.R.E.) influence fraudulent behavior in this context. Employing a quantitative approach, we collected data from 238 professionals in Chinese accounting firms via structured questionnaires, ensuring ethical compliance through anonymized responses and informed consent. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was utilized to analyze the relationships between the six fraud determinants and their interaction with Corporate Governance as a moderating variable. Key findings reveal that Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, and Ego exhibit significant positive effects on Fraud Behavior, while Rationalization showed no statistical significance. Notably, Corporate Governance negatively moderates the relationship between Opportunity and Fraud Behavior, suggesting that robust governance mechanisms can mitigate exploitable opportunities. This study contributes empirically by validating the Fraud Hexagon Theory in China’s unique institutional and cultural setting, contrasting with prior Western-centric studies, and offers actionable insights for policymakers and accounting firms to refine anti-fraud frameworks. Practically, the results underscore the need for ethics training targeting Ego-driven rationalizations and regulatory reforms to strengthen governance oversight. Methodologically, the research advances fraud literature by integrating SEM with a context-specific moderating analysis, addressing limitations in traditional linear models. Ethical considerations, including participant confidentiality and voluntary participation, were rigorously upheld throughout the study. These findings provide theoretical and practical guidance for corporate managers, regulators, and educators in combating financial fraud and fostering professional integrity in China’s rapidly evolving financial sector.

Multidisciplinary Science JournalVol. 7(12)
SEGi University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.