Evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron in comparison to ondansetron with dexamethasone for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients posted for infraumbilical surgeries – A prospective randomized double-blind stud

Background and Aims: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for infraumbilical surgeries. However, its association with complications such as hypotension (33%–80%) and bradycardia (13%) mandates caution in the perioperative period. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ondansetron versus ondansetron with dexamethasone in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and bradycardia in patients scheduled for non-obstetric infraumbilical surgeries. The time to rescue analgesia, time to two-segment regression, QT c interval changes, and blood glucose levels were examined as secondary objectives. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 140 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II, belonging to both sexes, undergoing infraumblical surgeries, were allocated to Group O (ondansetron n = 70) and Group OD (ondansetron and dexamethasone n = 70). After spinal anesthesia, patients’ hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate (HR); systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure; and SPO 2 , were noted every 3 min till 15 min and then every 5 min till 60 min or the end of surgery. Continuous measurements were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical measurements were presented as numbers (%). The Student’s t -test was used to determine the significance of the study parameters on a continuous scale between the two groups. Results: HR, mean arterial pressure, and the requirement for mephentermine and atropine injections were comparable between the two groups. Rescue analgesic requirement was earlier in Group O, at 127.33 ± 37.229 min versus 219.58 ± 73.9 min in Group OD, indicating prolonged postoperative analgesic action ( P ≤ 0.001). Higher blood glucose levels were observed 4 h after spinal anesthesia in Group OD (122 ± 25.43 mg/dL) than in Group O (108.13 ± 15.13 mg/dL), with a P < 0.001. Conclusion: Ondansetron, both as an individual molecule and combined with dexamethasone, effectively reduced the incidence of postspinal hypotension.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Indian Anaesthetists Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_5_25
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron in comparison to ondansetron with dexamethasone for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients posted for infraumbilical surgeries – A prospective randomized double-blind stud

Supraja Ponduru, Vyshnavi Renganathan, Vandana Pakhare, Vamshidhar Malipeddi et al.
The Indian Anaesthetists Forum
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron in comparison to ondansetron with dexamethasone for prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients posted for infraumbilical surgeries – A prospective randomized double-blind stud

Supraja Ponduru, Vyshnavi Renganathan, Vandana Pakhare, Vamshidhar Malipeddi, R. Gopinath, Ananya Nanda
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for infraumbilical surgeries. However, its association with complications such as hypotension (33%–80%) and bradycardia (13%) mandates caution in the perioperative period. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ondansetron versus ondansetron with dexamethasone in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and bradycardia in patients scheduled for non-obstetric infraumbilical surgeries. The time to rescue analgesia, time to two-segment regression, QT c interval changes, and blood glucose levels were examined as secondary objectives. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 140 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II, belonging to both sexes, undergoing infraumblical surgeries, were allocated to Group O (ondansetron n = 70) and Group OD (ondansetron and dexamethasone n = 70). After spinal anesthesia, patients’ hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate (HR); systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure; and SPO 2 , were noted every 3 min till 15 min and then every 5 min till 60 min or the end of surgery. Continuous measurements were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical measurements were presented as numbers (%). The Student’s t -test was used to determine the significance of the study parameters on a continuous scale between the two groups. Results: HR, mean arterial pressure, and the requirement for mephentermine and atropine injections were comparable between the two groups. Rescue analgesic requirement was earlier in Group O, at 127.33 ± 37.229 min versus 219.58 ± 73.9 min in Group OD, indicating prolonged postoperative analgesic action ( P ≤ 0.001). Higher blood glucose levels were observed 4 h after spinal anesthesia in Group OD (122 ± 25.43 mg/dL) than in Group O (108.13 ± 15.13 mg/dL), with a P < 0.001. Conclusion: Ondansetron, both as an individual molecule and combined with dexamethasone, effectively reduced the incidence of postspinal hypotension.

The Indian Anaesthetists ForumVol. 26(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.