(NE)DOVOLjNOST KOMPARATIVNOG I POZITIVNOG STEPENA U SRPSKOM I ENGLESKOM JEZIKU

Contemporary literature often classifies categorically diverse lexemes into adverbial intensifiers. The paper presents the results of independent corpus analyses of two languages. The largest available electronic corpora are used here: Corpus of Contem- porary American English (COCA) and Korpus savremenog srpskog jezika 2013 (KSSJ). A semasiological approach is used to identify adverbs signifying (in)sufficiency of the degree expressed by comparatives and positives. The contrastive analyses expand the repertoire of lexical expressions of the desired semantics described in the current literature. The adverbs within this class can be further classified based on their integral semes: ’sufficient degree’, ’insufficient degree’, and ’excessive degree’. This paper demonstrates that intensity is not an inherent property of this group of adverbs. In other words, semantically speaking, they are not real intensifiers. Based on their basic semantics, they are immediate classifiers of a degree of scalar expressions they modify. Finally, we must conclude that the adverbs of this class in both languages can be used as intensifiers, but only pragmatically. Based on the criteria defined by R. Đorđević (2005), the contrastive analysis conducted here can be determined as a theoretical, structural, descriptive contrastive analysis. The results demonstrate that the adverbials with the same integral seme in two languages are systematic equivalents to each other. The equivalence is illustrated with the examples retrieved from Englesko-srpski paralelni korpus (ESPK).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Узданица
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/uzdanica22.1.007jm
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(NE)DOVOLjNOST KOMPARATIVNOG I POZITIVNOG STEPENA U SRPSKOM I ENGLESKOM JEZIKU

Jelena Josijević, Јулијана С. Деспотовић
2 links
Узданица
Linguistics and language evolution
article

(NE)DOVOLjNOST KOMPARATIVNOG I POZITIVNOG STEPENA U SRPSKOM I ENGLESKOM JEZIKU

Jelena Josijević, Јулијана С. Деспотовић
article en

Abstract

Contemporary literature often classifies categorically diverse lexemes into adverbial intensifiers. The paper presents the results of independent corpus analyses of two languages. The largest available electronic corpora are used here: Corpus of Contem- porary American English (COCA) and Korpus savremenog srpskog jezika 2013 (KSSJ). A semasiological approach is used to identify adverbs signifying (in)sufficiency of the degree expressed by comparatives and positives. The contrastive analyses expand the repertoire of lexical expressions of the desired semantics described in the current literature. The adverbs within this class can be further classified based on their integral semes: ’sufficient degree’, ’insufficient degree’, and ’excessive degree’. This paper demonstrates that intensity is not an inherent property of this group of adverbs. In other words, semantically speaking, they are not real intensifiers. Based on their basic semantics, they are immediate classifiers of a degree of scalar expressions they modify. Finally, we must conclude that the adverbs of this class in both languages can be used as intensifiers, but only pragmatically. Based on the criteria defined by R. Đorđević (2005), the contrastive analysis conducted here can be determined as a theoretical, structural, descriptive contrastive analysis. The results demonstrate that the adverbials with the same integral seme in two languages are systematic equivalents to each other. The equivalence is illustrated with the examples retrieved from Englesko-srpski paralelni korpus (ESPK).

УзданицаVol. 1(22)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.