Partial and Comprehensive Understanding: An Analysis of the Interpretation of the Ḥadīṡ of Riddah Punishment

Ḥadīṡ regarding the punishment of riddah is often debated because partial understandings tend to cause misunderstandings, such as the view that Islam does not provide freedom of religion. A partial understanding of the ḥadīṡ of riddah punishment is often considered contrary to the values of Islamic justice and creates a negative perception of Islamic teachings in modern society. This study aims to analyze the difference between partial and comprehensive approaches in understanding the ḥadīṡ about riddah punishment. Using a qualitative method based on library research, this study examines primary and secondary literature through a descriptive-analytical approach. The study results show that the partial approach tends to ignore other related ḥadīṡ, socio-historical contexts, and maqāsid asy-syarī’ah principles, resulting in rigid interpretations. Instead, a comprehensive approach emphasizes the importance of understanding ḥadīṡ in the context of maqāsid asy-syarī’ah, such as maintaining societal stability and religious freedom. This study recommends using a comprehensive approach to understanding the ḥadīṡ considered controversial, so their interpretation is more relevant to the principles of justice and humanity in Islam, especially in the modern era that upholds the value of freedom.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIES
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v14i1.43095
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial and Comprehensive Understanding: An Analysis of the Interpretation of the Ḥadīṡ of Riddah Punishment

Nikmah Rochmawati, Ahmad Musyafiq, Muhammad Alfikri
JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIES
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Partial and Comprehensive Understanding: An Analysis of the Interpretation of the Ḥadīṡ of Riddah Punishment

Nikmah Rochmawati, Ahmad Musyafiq, Muhammad Alfikri
article en

Abstract

Ḥadīṡ regarding the punishment of riddah is often debated because partial understandings tend to cause misunderstandings, such as the view that Islam does not provide freedom of religion. A partial understanding of the ḥadīṡ of riddah punishment is often considered contrary to the values of Islamic justice and creates a negative perception of Islamic teachings in modern society. This study aims to analyze the difference between partial and comprehensive approaches in understanding the ḥadīṡ about riddah punishment. Using a qualitative method based on library research, this study examines primary and secondary literature through a descriptive-analytical approach. The study results show that the partial approach tends to ignore other related ḥadīṡ, socio-historical contexts, and maqāsid asy-syarī’ah principles, resulting in rigid interpretations. Instead, a comprehensive approach emphasizes the importance of understanding ḥadīṡ in the context of maqāsid asy-syarī’ah, such as maintaining societal stability and religious freedom. This study recommends using a comprehensive approach to understanding the ḥadīṡ considered controversial, so their interpretation is more relevant to the principles of justice and humanity in Islam, especially in the modern era that upholds the value of freedom.

JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIESVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.