An Examination of the Role of the Companions in Early Hadith Forgery

The role that the Prophet's companions played in the campaign to fake hadiths is investigated in this article. There are two competing opinions regarding the genesis of the appearance of fake hadith, while both agree that political factors are the fundamental trigger. According to the first opinion, since the beginning of Islam, there have been incorrect hadith. The first group of Muslims, the Companions of the Prophet, are the ones who are at fault. The majority of Western Revisionist academics, led by Goldziher and Schacht, agree with this viewpoint; non-mainstream Islamic scholars, such Ahmad Amin and Abu Rayyah, endorse it. On the other hand, mainstream Islamic scholars, led by Muhammad Mustafa Azami, disagree, citing the Companions’ justification (‘adalah al-sahabah). This article attempts to evaluate the arguments using the abductive method. Opinions that correspond to the data are taken, which are contrary to the rejection. It follows that the view that the Companions were complicit in the hadith’s falsification is the one that is more grounded in scientific evidence. Conversely, the viewpoints that dispute it are founded solely on the widely accepted Companions’ conception of justice, which is better described as dogma than actual scientific knowledge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIES
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v14i1.44422
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Examination of the Role of the Companions in Early Hadith Forgery

Muhammad Babul Ulum
JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIES
Archaeology and Historical Studies
article

An Examination of the Role of the Companions in Early Hadith Forgery

Muhammad Babul Ulum
article en

Abstract

The role that the Prophet's companions played in the campaign to fake hadiths is investigated in this article. There are two competing opinions regarding the genesis of the appearance of fake hadith, while both agree that political factors are the fundamental trigger. According to the first opinion, since the beginning of Islam, there have been incorrect hadith. The first group of Muslims, the Companions of the Prophet, are the ones who are at fault. The majority of Western Revisionist academics, led by Goldziher and Schacht, agree with this viewpoint; non-mainstream Islamic scholars, such Ahmad Amin and Abu Rayyah, endorse it. On the other hand, mainstream Islamic scholars, led by Muhammad Mustafa Azami, disagree, citing the Companions’ justification (‘adalah al-sahabah). This article attempts to evaluate the arguments using the abductive method. Opinions that correspond to the data are taken, which are contrary to the rejection. It follows that the view that the Companions were complicit in the hadith’s falsification is the one that is more grounded in scientific evidence. Conversely, the viewpoints that dispute it are founded solely on the widely accepted Companions’ conception of justice, which is better described as dogma than actual scientific knowledge.

JOURNAL OF QUR AN AND HADITH STUDIESVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.