Paradises lost: innocence and excremental whiteness in John Milton and James Baldwin

Abstract Juxtaposing John Milton’s Paradise Lost with James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room, this essay interrogates models of virtue with reference to Milton’s theology in dialogue with ideas “remastered” by Baldwin in resistance to the racialized assumptions of white America. Theoretically framed by the theological work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and radical Black theology, the comparison of Milton and Baldwin is undertaken to assess reparative reading as a practice, focusing on three key questions: what constitutes ethical heroism? How does it relate to a virtue that proves itself through trial? What is the specific role of the literary imagination in dramatizing each of these, allowing them to be experienced through reading? Reparative reading entails a notion of virtue that depends for its fulfilment on a model of contamination and contagion, “improper love,” explicated by Milton’s notion of “excremental whiteness” and Baldwin’s “stink of love.” Operating at the intersection of theology, race, and literature, this essay contributes to discussions about constructions of radical selfhood in Milton and Baldwin, theologies of race, and a practice of reparative reading embodying a hermeneutics that deconstructs rather than reinscribes familiar models of victimhood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literature and Theology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/litthe/fraf017
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paradises lost: innocence and excremental whiteness in John Milton and James Baldwin

Alison Searle
Literature and Theology
Race, History, and American Society
article

Paradises lost: innocence and excremental whiteness in John Milton and James Baldwin

Alison Searle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Juxtaposing John Milton’s Paradise Lost with James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room, this essay interrogates models of virtue with reference to Milton’s theology in dialogue with ideas “remastered” by Baldwin in resistance to the racialized assumptions of white America. Theoretically framed by the theological work of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and radical Black theology, the comparison of Milton and Baldwin is undertaken to assess reparative reading as a practice, focusing on three key questions: what constitutes ethical heroism? How does it relate to a virtue that proves itself through trial? What is the specific role of the literary imagination in dramatizing each of these, allowing them to be experienced through reading? Reparative reading entails a notion of virtue that depends for its fulfilment on a model of contamination and contagion, “improper love,” explicated by Milton’s notion of “excremental whiteness” and Baldwin’s “stink of love.” Operating at the intersection of theology, race, and literature, this essay contributes to discussions about constructions of radical selfhood in Milton and Baldwin, theologies of race, and a practice of reparative reading embodying a hermeneutics that deconstructs rather than reinscribes familiar models of victimhood.

Literature and TheologyVol. 38(4)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.