Novel Weighted Citation Methods for Ranking Academic Authors: Introducing NWC and TSWC Indexing Methods

Author ranking is an essential metric for assessing academic performance and facilitating comparisons within citation networks. While several indexing methods have been proposed to enhance author ranking, existing approaches often fail to capture the true contribution of authors to the literature. This study introduces two novel weighted citation methods to improve author ranking in academic citation networks. The first method, Normalized Weighted Citations (NWC), evaluates the rankings of co-authors within a publication. The second method, Topic-Sensitive Weighted Citations (TSWC), assigns scores to authors based on their relevance to specific research domains. Our goal is to identify both highly influential and less prominent authors within citation networks on a global scale. We evaluate our methods using scholarly publication datasets and compare them with a baseline approach. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform traditional ranking techniques, highlighting the importance of accurately assessing researchers’ impact in citation networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.658
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Weighted Citation Methods for Ranking Academic Authors: Introducing NWC and TSWC Indexing Methods

Sardar Usman, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Akbar Hussain, Muhammad Hasnain et al.
Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
article

Novel Weighted Citation Methods for Ranking Academic Authors: Introducing NWC and TSWC Indexing Methods

Sardar Usman, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Akbar Hussain, Muhammad Hasnain, Imtiaz Hussain
article en

Abstract

Author ranking is an essential metric for assessing academic performance and facilitating comparisons within citation networks. While several indexing methods have been proposed to enhance author ranking, existing approaches often fail to capture the true contribution of authors to the literature. This study introduces two novel weighted citation methods to improve author ranking in academic citation networks. The first method, Normalized Weighted Citations (NWC), evaluates the rankings of co-authors within a publication. The second method, Topic-Sensitive Weighted Citations (TSWC), assigns scores to authors based on their relevance to specific research domains. Our goal is to identify both highly influential and less prominent authors within citation networks on a global scale. We evaluate our methods using scholarly publication datasets and compare them with a baseline approach. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform traditional ranking techniques, highlighting the importance of accurately assessing researchers’ impact in citation networks.

Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & TechnologyVol. 15(1)
University of Management and Technology (US), Lahore Leads University (PK), University of Management and Technology (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.