Regulatory Frameworks for Human Gene Editing: A Systematic Literature Review

Human gene editing technologies, especially CRISPR-Cas9, have advanced rapidly, raising complex regulatory, ethical, and scientific issues. This study reviews 47 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The analysis reveals major empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practical gaps in governance. It notes a lack of global harmonisation, weak ethical oversight, and inconsistent national policies that obstruct responsible innovation. Developing countries often lack enforceable guidelines, while developed nations use varied regulatory frameworks, leading to fragmentation. The study recommends a shared, participatory regulatory model, stronger international cooperation, and better integration of bioethics into policy-making. These steps are vital to ensure fair access, protect human dignity, and build public trust as gene editing moves into clinical and societal applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Policy
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.333
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Frameworks for Human Gene Editing: A Systematic Literature Review

Asela Ekanayake, Duminda De Silva, K. R. A. W. Fernando
International Journal of Law and Policy
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Regulatory Frameworks for Human Gene Editing: A Systematic Literature Review

Asela Ekanayake, Duminda De Silva, K. R. A. W. Fernando
article en

Abstract

Human gene editing technologies, especially CRISPR-Cas9, have advanced rapidly, raising complex regulatory, ethical, and scientific issues. This study reviews 47 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The analysis reveals major empirical, theoretical, methodological, and practical gaps in governance. It notes a lack of global harmonisation, weak ethical oversight, and inconsistent national policies that obstruct responsible innovation. Developing countries often lack enforceable guidelines, while developed nations use varied regulatory frameworks, leading to fragmentation. The study recommends a shared, participatory regulatory model, stronger international cooperation, and better integration of bioethics into policy-making. These steps are vital to ensure fair access, protect human dignity, and build public trust as gene editing moves into clinical and societal applications.

International Journal of Law and PolicyVol. 3(6)
Australian Institute of Business (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulatory Frameworks for Human Gene Editing: A Systematic Literature Review — Asela Ekanayake, Duminda De Silva, et al. · International Journal of Law and Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS